e. block the passage of numerous constitutional amendments.
7. How did the Articles of Confederation compare to the Constitution in regard to sovereignty?
a. Under the Articles, states had more autonomy, while the Constitution gave no powers to the states.
b. Under the Articles, states had more autonomy, while the Constitution gave some powers to the states.
c. Under the Articles, states had no power to run the country, while the Constitution gave more powers to the
states.
d. Under the Articles, states had some power to run the country, while the Constitution gave more powers to
the states.
e. Under both the Articles and the Constitution, the states and national government had equal power to run the
country.
8. How did the Articles of Confederation compare to the Constitution with regard to the economy?
a. Under the Articles, states made more decisions about the economy than the national government.
b. Under the Articles, states did not take an interest in their respective economies.
c. Under the new Constitution, land distribution would benefit the poor.
d. Under the new Constitution, current property holders were losing rights.
e. Under both the Articles and the Constitution, the national government played a prominent role in economic
decisions.
9. What was Congress able to accomplish with its Native American policy under the Articles of Confederation?
a. Nothing; Congress was so powerless under the Articles that nothing happened in this area.
b. It negotiated treaties for the tribes to keep their lands, but Congress was so lacking in power that the treaties
proved useless.
c. Congress demanded and received surrenders of large amounts of Indian land north of the Ohio River and in
the South.
d. Congress backed away from any involvement when land companies requested that the government step
aside and leave the West’s economic development in private hands.