c. It allowed smugglers to pay a fine rather than being tried in a court with a jury.
d. It outlawed the admiralty courts and forced smugglers to stand trial in London.
e. It was expected to worsen an existing economic recession.
11. With the Sugar Act, Britain
a. attempted to force the North American colonies to import more sugar from the British West Indies.
b. abolished slavery on all colonial sugar plantations.
c. required colonists to work for wages on Barbadian sugar plantations.
d. cracked down on smuggling by prosecuting accused smugglers without the benefit of a jury trial.
e. required South Carolina and Virginia to shift their main crops to sugar.
12. The Stamp Act created such a stir in the colonies because
a. it was established by the King without Parliament’s approval.
b. lawyers were offended that they could be jailed for not using the correct stamp on legal documents.
c. it was the first direct tax Parliament imposed on the colonies.
d. none of the revenue raised would be spent within the colonies themselves.
e. Benjamin Franklin went public with his opposition to it.
13. How did the Stamp Act differ from the Sugar Act?
a. Whereas the Stamp Act was still in place at the time of the outbreak of the Revolutionary War, the Sugar
Act was quickly repealed.
b. Whereas the Stamp Act affected, and therefore offended, a large portion of the colonial population, the
Sugar Act mainly affected residents of colonial ports.
c. Whereas the Stamp Act was predominantly opposed by northern merchants, the Sugar Act was mainly
opposed by southern planters.
d. Whereas the Stamp Act was passed in close collaboration with colonial leaders, the Sugar Act was a total
surprise to the colonists.
e. Whereas the Stamp Act focused on the regulation of trade, the Sugar Act was a direct tax on the colonists.