202. Refer to the data for Beatrice Equipment.
Assume that Beatrice Equipment estimates bad debts at 1% of net credit sales.
What amount will Beatrice Equipment record as bad debts expense for 2016?
How much is the net realizable value of accounts receivable reported on Beatrice
Equipment’s balance sheet at December 31, 2016?
A) ($2,400,000 – $60,000) × .01 = $23,400
B) [$160,000 – ($25,600 – $23,700 + $23,400)] = $134,700
FACC.PONO.13.07-01 – LO: 07-01
203. Refer to Beatrice Equipment.
Assume that Beatrice Equipment estimates bad debts on an aging analysis, and the aging schedule indicates that $28,000
of the December 31, 2016 accounts receivable will be uncollectible.
What amount will Beatrice Equipment recognize as bad debts expense for 2016?
How much is the net realizable value of the receivables to be reported on Beatrice
Equipment’s balance sheet at December 31, 2016?
A) $28,000 – ($25,600 – $23,700) = $26,100
B) ($160,000 – $28,000) = $132,000
FACC.PONO.13.07-01 – LO: 07-01
204. If a company has a choice of acceptable methods to estimate bad debts, what factors should be considered in the
selection?
The percentage of net sales approach emphasizes the matching principle. The aging approach
emphasizes the valuation of the receivables at the net amount to be collected. A company
should be concerned with both income measurement and balance sheet valuation, but must
choose one of the two approaches, most likely based on management philosophy. If most
customer balances fall within a small range of variation, the percentage of sales approach,
which is easier to apply, probably will give reasonable results for both income measurement
and asset valuation. However, if there is a wide variation in the amounts of customer
balances, and especially if some large customer balances are significantly past due and their
collection is very uncertain, then the aging approach should give better results for both
income measurement and asset valuation.
FACC.PONO.13.07-01 – LO: 07-01