Test Bank for Accounting: Tools for Business Decision Making, Fifth Edition
FOR INSTRUCTOR USE ONLY
S-A E 257 (Ethics)
Hiller Corporation manufactures electronic components for use in many consumer products. Their
raw materials are purchased literally from all over the world. Depending on the country involved,
purchase terms vary widely. Some suppliers, for example, require full prepayment, while others
are content to receive payment within six months of receipt of the goods.
Because of this situation, Hiller never closes its books until at least ten days after month end. In
this way, it can sort out ownership of goods in transit, and document which goods were received
by month end, and which were not.
Donna Gordon, a new accountant, was asked to record about $50,000 in inventory as having
been received before month end. She argued that the shipping documents clearly showed that
the goods were actually received on the 8th of the current month. Her boss, busy with month-end
reports, curtly tells Donna to check the shipping terms. She did so, and found the notation “FOB
(free on board) shipper’s dock” on the document. She hadn’t seen that particular notation before,
but she reasoned that if the selling company considered it shipped when it reached their dock,
Hiller should consider it received when it reached Hiller’s dock. She did not record the sale until
after month end.
Required:
1. Why are accountants concerned with the timing in the recording of purchases?
2. Was there a violation of ethical standards here? Explain.
S-A E 258 (Communication)
Sandy Lang and Mandy Starr, two salespersons in adjoining territories, regularly compete for
bonuses. During the last month, their dollar volume of sales, on which the bonuses are based,
was nearly equal. On May 30, 2014, each made a large sale. Both orders were shipped on May
31, 2014, the last day of the month, and both were received by the customers on June 5, 2014.
Sandy’s sale was FOB shipping point (ownership passes to buyer at time of shipping), and
Mandy’s was FOB destination (ownership passes to buyer at time of receipt). The printed policy
of the company states that sales “count” for purposes of calculating bonuses on the date that
ownership passes to the purchaser. Sandy’s sale was therefore counted in her May monthly total
of sales while Mandy’s sale was not. Mandy is quite upset. She has asked you to just include it,
or to take Sandy’s off as well. She also has told you that you are being unethical for allowing
Sandy to get a bonus just for choosing a particular shipping method.