Answer questions 1 to 4 using as the base case the firm valuation and deal structure data in the model available on
MyLMU Connect entitled Thermo Fisher Buys Life Technologies Financial Model. Assume that the base case
assumptions were those used by Thermo Fisher in its merger with Life Tech. The base case reflects the input data
described in this case study. To answer each question you must change selected input data in the base case, which
will change significantly the base case projections. After answering a specific question, do not save the model
results. This will cause the model to revert back to the base case. In this way, it will be possible to analyze each
question in terms of how it is different from the base case.
1. Thermo Fisher paid $76 per share for each outstanding share of Life Tech. What is the maximum offer
price Thermo Fisher could have made without ceding all of the synergy value to Life Tech shareholders?
(Hint: Using the Transaction Summary Worksheet, increase the offer price until the NPV in the section
entitled Valuation turns negative.)
2. Thermo Fisher designed a capital structure for financing the deal that would retain its investment grade
credit rating. To do so, it targeted a debt to total capital and interest coverage ratio consistent with the
industry average for these credit ratios. What is the potential impact on Thermo Fisher’s ability to retain an
investment grade credit rating if it had financed the takeover using 100% senior debt? (Hint: In the Sources
and Uses section of the Transaction Summary Worksheet, set excess cash, new common shares issued, and
convertible preferred shares to zero. Senior debt will automatically increase to 100% of the equity
consideration plus transaction expenses.) Explain your answer.
3. Assuming Thermo Fisher would have been able to purchase the firm in a share for share exchange, what
would have happened to the EPS in the first year? (Hint: In the form of payment section of the Acquirer
Transaction Summary Worksheet, set the percentage of the payment denoted by “% Stock” to 100%. In the
Sources and Uses Section, set excess cash, new common shares issued, and convertible preferred shares to
zero.)
4. Mark Fisher, CEO of Thermo Fisher, asked rhetorically what if synergy were not realized as quickly and in
the amount expected. How patient would shareholders be if the projected impact on earnings per share was
not realized? Assume that the integration effort is far more challenging than anticipated and that only one–
fourth of the expected SG&A savings, margin improvement, and revenue synergy are realized.
Furthermore, assume that actual integration expenses (shown on Newco’s Assumptions Worksheet) due to
the unanticipated need to upgrade and co-locate research and development facilities and to transfer
hundreds of staff are $150 million in 2014, $150 million in 2015, $100 million in 2016, and $50 million in
2017. The model output resulting from these assumption changes is called the Impaired Integration Case.
What is the impact on Thermo Fisher’s earning per share (including Life Tech) and the net present value
of the combined firms? Compare the difference between the model “Base Case” and the model output from
the “Impaired Integration Case” resulting from making the changes indicated in this question. (Hints: In the
Synergy Section of the Acquirer (Thermo Fisher) Worksheet, reduce the synergy inputs for each year
between 2014 and 2016 by seventy-five percent and allow them to remain at those levels through 2018.