Quick search
Join
Home
>
Quiz
>
Finance Chapter 12 Worthington Inc. is considering a project that has
Sidebar
Close
Finance Chapter 12 Worthington Inc. is considering a project that has
0
Helpful
0
Unhelpful
May 30, 2023
Related documents
Econ 120 Practice Test Answers
Chapter 1 Business And Its Environment
Sociology
Wow My Love
Case Report Laquinta
Article Review: Administrators and Accountability: The Plurality of Value Systems in the Public Domain
FC 42957
FC 62472
FIN 91396
FE 34842
Unlock access to all the studying documents.
View Full Document
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
83.
Worthington Inc.
is
considering
a project that has the following
cash
flow data. What
is
the project’s
payback?
Year
0
1
2
3
Cash flows
−
$500
$150
$200
$300
a.
2.03 years
b.
2.25 years
c.
2.50 years
d.
2.75 years
e.
3.03 years
Difficulty: Easy
INTE.GENE.16.82 – LO:
12
-7
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
84.
Poder Inc.
is
considering a project that has th
e following
cash
flow data. What
is
the project’s pay
back?
Year
0
1
2
3
Cash flows
−
$750
$300
$325
$350
a.
1.91 years
b.
2.12 years
c.
2.36 years
d.
2.59 years
e.
2.85 years
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
85.
Reed Enterprises
is
considering a project th
at has the following
cash
flow and WACC data. What
is
the pr
oject’s
NPV? Note that a project’s expected
NPV
can
be
negative,
in
which
case
it
will
be
rejected.
WACC:
10.00%
Year
0
1
2
3
Cash flows
−
$1,050
$450
$460
$470
a.
$92.37
b.
$96.99
c.
$101.84
d.
$106.93
e.
$112.28
a
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.79 – LO:
12
-3
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
capital
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
NPV
TYPE:
Mu
ltiple Choice: Problem
86.
Patterson Co.
is
considering a project that
has the following
cash
flow and WACC data. What
is
the project’s NPV?
Note that a project’s expected
NPV
can
be
negative,
in
which
case
it
will
be
rejected.
WACC:
10.00%
Year
0
1
2
3
Cash flows
−
$950
$500
$400
$300
Difficulty: Easy
INTE.GENE.16.82 – LO:
12
-7
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
United
St
ates –
OH
– Default City
– TBA
Payback
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
a.
$54.62
b.
$57.49
c.
$60.52
d.
$63.54
e.
$66.72
c
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.79 – LO:
12
-3
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
NPV
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
87.
Yoga Center Inc.
is
considering a project that
has the following
cash
flo
w and WACC data. What
is
the project’s
NPV? Note that a project’s expected
NPV
can
be
negative,
in
which
case
it
will
be
rejected.
WACC:
14.00%
Year
0
1
2
3
4
Cash flows
−
$1,200
$400
$425
$450
$475
a.
$41.25
b.
$45.84
c.
$50.93
d.
$56.59
e.
$62.88
e
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.79 – LO:
12
-3
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
NPV
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
88.
Dickson Co.
is
considering a project th
at has the following
cash
flow and WACC data. What
is
the project’s NPV?
Note that a project’s expected
NPV
can
be
negative,
in
which
case
it
will
be
rejected.
WACC:
12.00%
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
Cash flows
−
$1,100
$400
$390
$380
$370
$360
a.
$250.15
b.
$277.94
c.
$305.73
d.
$336.31
e.
$369.94
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.79 – LO:
12
-3
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
NPV
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
89.
Kiley Electronics
is
considering a project that has
the following
cash
flo
w data. What
is
the project’s IRR? Note
that a
project’s
IRR
can
be
less than the WACC (and
even negative),
in
which
case
it
will
be
rejected.
Year
0
1
2
3
Cash flows
−
$1,100
$450
$470
$490
a.
9.70%
b.
10.78%
c.
11.98%
d.
13.31%
e.
14.64%
Difficulty: Moderate
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
90.
Modern Refurbishing Inc.
is
considering a pr
oject that has the following
cash
flow data. What
is
the project’s
IRR?
Note that a project’s
IRR
can
be
less than the WACC (and
even negative),
in
which
case
it
will
be
rejected.
Year
0
1
2
3
4
Cash flows
−
$850
$300
$290
$280
$270
a.
13.13%
b.
14.44%
c.
15.89%
d.
17.48%
e.
19.22%
a
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.80 – LO:
12
-4
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
91.
Pet World
is
considering a project that has th
e following
cash
flo
w data. What
is
the project’s
IRR?
Note
that a
project’s
IRR
can
be
less than the WACC (and
even negative),
in
which
case
it
will
be
rejected.
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
Cash flows
−
$9,500
$2,000
$2,025
$2,050
$2,075
$2,100
a.
2.08%
b.
2.31%
c.
2.57%
d.
2.82%
e.
3.10%
c
INTE.GENE.16.80 – LO:
12
-4
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
92.
Last month, Standard Systems analyzed th
e project whose
cash
flows are shown below. However, befo
re the decision
to
accept
or
reject the project took pl
ace, the Federal Reserve changed interest
rates and therefore the firm’s WACC. Th
e
Fed’s action did
not
affect the forecasted
cash
flows.
By
how
much did the
ch
ange
in
th
e WACC affect the project’s
forecasted NPV? Note that a pr
oject’s expected NPV
can
be
negative,
in
which
case
it
should
be
rejected.
Old WACC:
10.00%
New
WACC:
11.25%
Year
0
1
2
3
Cash flows
−
$1,000
$410
$410
$410
a.
−
$18.89
b.
−
$19.88
c.
−
$20.93
d.
−
$22.03
e.
−
$23.13
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.79 – LO:
12
-3
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
capital
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
NPV sensitivity
to
WACC
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
93.
Corner Jewelers, Inc. recently analyzed
the project whose
cash
flows are shown below. However,
before the company
decided
to
accept
or
reject the project,
the Federal Reserve changed in
terest rates and therefore the firm’s W
ACC. The
Fed’s action did
not
affect the forecasted
cash
flows.
By
how
much did the change
in
the WACC
affect the project’s
forecasted NPV? Note that a pr
oject’s expected NPV
can
be
negative,
in
which
case
it
should
be
rejected.
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.80 – LO:
12
-4
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
capital
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
Old WACC:
8.00%
New
WACC:
11.25%
Year
0
1
2
3
Cash flows
−
$1,000
$410
$410
$410
a.
−
$59.03
b.
−
$56.08
c.
−
$53.27
d.
−
$50.61
e.
−
$48.08
a
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.79 – LO:
12
-3
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
NPV sensitivity
to
WACC
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
94.
Computer Consultants Inc.
is
considering
a project that has the following
cash
flow and WACC data. What
is
the
project’s MIRR? Note that a proj
ect’s MIRR
can
be
less than the WACC (and
even negative),
in
which
case
it
will
be
rejected.
WACC:
10.00%
Year
0
1
2
3
Cash flows
−
$1,000
$450
$450
$450
a.
9.32%
b.
10.35%
c.
11.50%
d.
12.78%
e.
14.20%
e
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
95.
Wiley’s Wire Products
is
considering
a project that has the following
cash
flow and WACC data.
What
is
the project’s
MIRR? Note that a project’s MIRR
can
be
less than the WACC (and
even negative),
in
which
case
it
will
be
rejected.
WACC:
11.00%
Year
0
1
2
3
Cash flows
−
$800
$350
$350
$350
a.
8.86%
b.
9.84%
c.
10.94%
d.
12.15%
e.
13.50%
e
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.81 – LO:
12
-5
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
MIRR
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
96.
Watts Co.
is
considering a project that has th
e following
cash
flow and WACC data. What
is
the
project’s MIRR? Note
that a project’s MIRR
can
be
less than the
WACC (and even negative),
in
which
case
it
will
be
rejected.
WACC:
10.00%
Year
0
1
2
3
4
Cash flows
−
$850
$300
$320
$340
$360
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.81 – LO:
12
-5
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
MIRR
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
a.
14.08%
b.
15.65%
c.
17.21%
d.
18.94%
e.
20.83%
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.81 – LO:
12
-5
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
MIRR
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
97.
Westwood Painting Co.
is
considering a project
that has the following
cash
flow and WACC data. What
is
th
e
project’s MIRR? Note that a proj
ect’s MIRR
can
be
less than the WACC (and
even negative),
in
which
case
it
will
be
rejected.
WACC:
12.25%
Year
0
1
2
3
4
Cash flows
−
$850
$300
$320
$340
$360
a.
13.42%
b.
14.91%
c.
16.56%
d.
18.22%
e.
20.04%
c
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
98.
Suzanne’s Cleaners
is
considering
a project that has the following
cash
flow data. What
is
the proj
ect’s payback?
Year
0
1
2
3
4
5
Cash flows
−
$1,100
$300
$310
$320
$330
$340
a.
2.31 years
b.
2.56 years
c.
2.85 years
d.
3.16 years
e.
3.52 years
e
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.82 – LO:
12
-7
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
Payback
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
99.
Craig’s Car Wash Inc.
is
considering a proj
ect that has the following
cash
flow and WACC data. What
is
the project’s
discounted payback?
WACC:
10.00%
Year
0
1
2
3
Cash flows
−
$900
$500
$500
$500
a.
1.88 years
b.
2.09 years
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.81 – LO:
12
-5
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
capital
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
MIRR
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
c.
2.29 years
d.
2.52 years
e.
2.78 years
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.82 – LO:
12
-7
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
Discounted payback
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
100.
Shannon Co.
is
considering a project that has
the following
cash
flow and WACC data. What
is
th
e project’s
discounted payback?
WACC:
10.00%
Year
0
1
2
3
4
Cash flows
−
$950
$525
$485
$445
$405
a.
1.61 years
b.
1.79 years
c.
1.99 years
d.
2.22 years
e.
2.44 years
Difficulty: Moderate
INTE.GENE.16.82 – LO:
12
-7
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
United States –
AK
– DISC:
Capital budgeting and
cost – DISC: Capital budgeting and
cost
of
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
a
101.
Current Design Co.
is
considering two mutually
exclusive, equally risky,
and not repeatable projects, S and
L.
Th
eir
cash
flows are shown
below. The CEO believes the
IRR
is
the best
selection criterion, while the CFO adv
ocates the NPV.
If
the decision
is
made
by
choosing
the
pr
oject with the higher IRR rather than
the
one
with the higher NPV,
how
much,
if
any, value will
be
forgone, i.e.,
what’s the chosen NPV versus the
maximum possible NPV? Note th
at (1) “true value”
is
measured
by
NPV, and (2) under
some conditions the choice
of
IRR
vs. NPV will
have
no
effect
on
the value gained
or
lost.
WACC:
7.50%
Year
0
1
2
3
4
CF
S
−
$1,100
$550
$600
$100
$100
CF
L
−
$2,700
$650
$725
$800
$1,400
a.
$138.10
b.
$149.21
c.
$160.31
d.
$171.42
e.
$182.52
capital
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
102.
Murray Inc.
is
considering Projects S and
L,
whose cash flows are shown belo
w. These projects are mutually
exclusive, equally risky,
and not repeatable. The CEO wants
to
use th
e
IRR
criterion, while the CFO favors th
e NPV
method. You were hired
to
advise Mu
rray on the best procedure.
If
the wrong decision criterion
is
used,
how much
potential value would Mu
rray lose?
WACC:
6.00%
Year
0
1
2
3
4
CF
S
−
$1,025
$380
$380
$380
$380
CF
L
−
$2,150
$765
$765
$765
$765
a.
$188.68
b.
$198.61
c.
$209.07
d.
$219.52
e.
$230.49
c
capital
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
103.
Projects S and
L,
whose cash flows are shown
below, are mutually exclusive,
equally risky, and not repeatable.
Hooper Inc.
is
considerin
g which
of
these two projects
to
un
dertake.
If
the decision
is
made
by
choosing
the project with
the higher IRR,
how
much value will
be
forgon
e? Note that under certain conditions
choosing projects
on
the basis
of
the
IRR
will
not
cause any value
to
be
lost because the project with
the higher
IRR
will also hav
e the higher NPV,
so
no
value
will
be
lost
if
the
IRR
method
is
used.
WACC:
10.25%
Year
0
1
2
3
4
CF
S
−
$2,050
$750
$760
$770
$780
CF
L
−
$4,300
$1,500
$1,518
$1,536
$1,554
a.
$134.79
b.
$141.89
c.
$149.36
d.
$164.29
e.
$205.36
c
Difficulty: Challenging
INTE.GENE.16.80 – LO:
12
-4
United States – BUSPROG: Analy
tic
capital
United States –
OH
– Default
City – TBA
NPV vs.
IRR
TYPE: Multiple Choice: Pro
blem
104.
Markman & Sons
is
considering
Projects S and
L.
These projects are mutu
ally exclusive, equally risky,
and not
repeatable and their
cash
flows are shown below.
If
the decision
is
made
by
choosing th
e project with the higher
IRR,
how
much value will
be
forgone? Note that un
der certain conditions choosin
g projects
on
the basis
of
the
IRR
will n
ot
cause
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
any value
to
be
lost because the project with
the higher
IRR
will also have th
e higher NPV, i.e.,
no
conflict will exist.
WACC:
10.00%
Year
0
1
2
3
4
CF
S
−
$1,025
$650
$450
$250
$50
CF
L
−
$1,025
$100
$300
$500
$700
a.
$5.47
b.
$6.02
c.
$6.62
d.
$7.29
e.
$7.82
e
105.
Carolina Company
is
considering
Projects S and
L,
whose cash flows are sho
wn below. These projects are mutually
exclusive, equally risky,
and are
not
repeatable.
If
the decision
is
made
by
choosing
the project with the higher
IRR,
how
much value will
be
forgone? Note that un
der some conditions choosing
projects
on
the basis
of
the
IRR
will cause $0.00
value
to
be
lost.
WACC:
7.75%
Year
0
1
2
3
4
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
CF
S
−
$1,050
$675
$650
CF
L
−
$1,050
$360
$360
$360
$360
a.
$11.45
b.
$12.72
c.
$14.63
d.
$16.82
e.
$19.35
capital
106.
Silverman Co.
is
considering Projects S and
L,
whose
cash
flows are shown
below. These projects are mutually
exclusive, equally risky,
and not repeatable.
If
the decision
is
made
by
cho
osing the project with the higher MIRR rather
than the
one
with the higher NPV,
how
much value will
be
forgone?
Note that under some conditions
choosing projects
on
the basis
of
the MIRR will cause $0
.00 value
to
be
lost.
WACC:
8.75%
Year
0
1
2
3
4
CF
S
−
$1,100
$375
$375
$375
$375
CF
L
−
$2,200
$725
$725
$725
$725
a.
$32.12
b.
$35.33
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
c.
$38.87
d.
$40.15
e.
$42.16
107.
Farmer Co.
is
considering Projects S and
L,
whose
cash
flows are shown
below. These projects are mutually
exclusive, equally risky,
and not repeatable.
If
the decision
is
made
by
cho
osing the project with the shorter payback,
some value may
be
forgone. How much
value will
be
lost
in
this instance? Note that un
der some conditions choosing
projects
on
the basis
of
the shorter payback
will
not
cause value
to
be
lost.
WACC:
10.25%
Year
0
1
2
3
4
CF
S
−
$950
$500
$800
$0
$0
CF
L
−
$2,100
$400
$800
$800
$1,000
a.
$24.14
b.
$26.82
c.
$29.80
d.
$33.11
e.
$36.42
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES
108.
Langton Inc.
is
considering Projects S and
L,
whose
cash
flows are shown belo
w. These projects are mutually
exclusive, equally risky,
and not repeatable. The CEO believes the
IRR
is
the best
selection criterion, while th
e CFO
advocates the MIRR.
If
the
decision
is
made
by
choosing the project with
the higher
IRR
rather than the
one
wi
th
the
higher MIRR,
how
much,
if
any, value will
be
forgone.
In
other word
s, what’s the NPV
of
the chosen project versus
the
maximum possible NPV? Note
that (1) “true value”
is
measured
by
NPV, and (2) under
some conditions the choice
of
IRR
vs. MIRR will have
no
effect
on
the value lost.
WACC:
7.00%
Year
0
1
2
3
4
CF
S
−
$1,100
$550
$600
$100
$100
CF
L
−
$2,750
$725
$725
$800
$1,400
a.
$185.90
b.
$197.01
c.
$208.11
d.
$219.22
e.
$230.32
CHAPTER
12
—
CAPITAL B
UDGETING: DECISION RULES