42. One of the conclusions from Akerlof’s paper titled “The Market for Lemons” was:
a. high quality goods will drive low quality goods out of the market.
b. lacking the ability to distinguish high from low quality, the quality the market will end up
offering will be the average quality.
c. lacking the ability to distinguish high from low quality, low quality may drive high quality out
of the market.
d. high quality is always demanded by consumers over low quality.
43. Mary Jones is the president of a local bank. She knows that half of the loan applicants in
town she would classify as high risk and the other half as low risk. She observes that the other
banks in town charge two different interest rates, a lower rate for low risk borrowers and the
higher rate for high risk borrowers. She decides that to have an advantage over the other banks
she will offer an average rate to everyone. The likely result will be:
a. Mary’s bank will be highly successful as this will provide the bank with a large competitive
advantage.
b. Mary’s bank is likely to see a dramatic increase in both types of borrowers.
c. Mary’s bank will experience adverse selection and have a disproportionate number of low risk
borrowers.
d. Mary’s bank will experience adverse selection and have a disproportionate number of high risk
borrowers.
44. One lesson that Akerlof’s Lemons model provides is:
a. that for high quality providers to survive they must provide a way that customers can
distinguish high quality from low quality.
b. low quality will not survive in a market.
c. people always prefer high quality to low quality goods.
d. moral hazard is unavoidable.