40. Considering the theory of purchasing power parity, if inflation in Mexico is 5% while prices
in the U.S. are stable; we should expect over the period of a year:
a. the dollar to appreciate 5% relative to the peso.
b. the peso to appreciate 5% relative to the dollar.
c. the nominal exchange rate to stay fixed.
d. the real exchange rate of U.S. goods / Mexican goods to appreciate 5%.
41. The empirical evidence on purchasing power parity over the long run seems to point out that:
a. the higher a country‘s inflation rate, the greater is the appreciation in the country’s currency.
b. the theory of purchasing power parity cannot explain long-run changes in exchange rates.
c. the higher a country‘s inflation rate the greater is the depreciation in the country‘s currency.
d. there isn’t any clear link between inflation rates and exchange rates.
42. The empirical evidence on purchasing power parity seems to point out that:
a. purchasing power parity can explain long run movements in exchange rates but does not hold
up to scrutiny for short-run changes.
b. purchasing power parity does a good job of explaining short-run movements in exchange
rates, but does not hold up to scrutiny over the long run.
c. purchasing power parity is a good theory for international trade, but is of little use in
explaining exchange rate movements.
d. inflation and a country‘s rate of currency appreciation are positively correlated.