Which of the following is the explanation of why the market generally reacts negatively
to the announcement of a SEO offered in the pecking order hypothesis?
a. Management is taking a self-serving action.
b. Management is signaling that the shares are overpriced.
c. Creditors are forcing the firm to increase its equity base.
d. The firm is revealing that it has not generated as much earnings as the market
expected.
Nutrition, Inc., a vitamin supplement manufacturer, is financed entirely with equity that
is currently privately owned by its managers. The firm is expected to generate earnings
of $5 mn. per year into perpetuity, and all earnings are paid out in dividends. The
owner-managers receive no additional compensation. For all of the owner-managers,
their shares of the firm’s equity accounts for the bulk of their personal wealth. As a
result, in determining their personal valuation of the firm they apply a high discount
rate of 33 percent to their future expected dividends, and therefore they value the firm
at $15.15mn. (=$5mn./0.33). The firm’s management team has recently consulted with
an investment-banking firm about selling all of the firm’s equity publicly; that is, about
going public with the firm’s shares. Assuming that the current management will
continue to operate the firm, the investment-banking firm estimates that the market will
value the firm’s equity applying a 25% discount rate to expected future dividends.
However, expected dividends to public shareholders will be only $4 mn., because
managers will now be paid a total of $1 mn. per year in salaries. (Ignore taxes and
transaction costs.) The total market value of the firm’s public shares is ___(i)___.
Accounting for both the present value of management’s salaries (discounted into
perpetuity at 33%) and the proceeds from the public sale of shares, management’s
wealth gain from going public is ___(ii)___.