5. Pillar 2 may ask too
much of regulators6. Risk weights based on
external credit rating agencies7. Competition8. Portfolio aspects9. Risk weights
A/ Because of different tax, accounting, and safety-net rules and the application of the
new Basel III rules to different industries, a level playing field across banks in different
countries will not occur.B/ Because DIs may have little incentive to make high risk
commercial loans, one important aspect of intermediation may be somewhat
curtailed.C/ The benefits may not support the significant cost of developing and
implementing new risk management systems.D/ Banks in the U.S. likely would
need additional capital to meet the new minimum standards.E/ Interest rate and liquidity
risks are not yet included in the proposed Basel III plan.F/ Regulators may not be
trained or willing to make the necessary decisions that may rely heavily on judgment.G/
The BIS plans largely ignore the covariance among asset risks between different
parties.H/ The four (five) risk weight categories in Basel I (Basel II) may not reflect the
true credit risk.I/ Because rating agencies often lag rather than lead the business cycle,
risk weights based on a loan’s credit
rating may not accurately measure the relative risk exposure of individual borrowers.
Answer:
Answer: