3. Preferred Contractors was a general contractor and owner of a condominium complex which was
under construction. Barrett, a subcontractor, had been hired by Henderson Plumbing, another
subcontractor, to help it complete the plumbing work on the project. When Henderson began using
shoddy installation procedures and subsequently fell behind the scheduled completion time for the
project, Preferred Contractors urged Barrett to correct Henderson’s mistakes and to finish the job.
Barrett refused to continue until he knew who would pay him, since he feared Henderson’s financial
position was shaky. Nonetheless, Preferred Contractors’ job superintendent told Barrett to go ahead
even if Barrett and Preferred Contractors had no contract because “he would use his influence to try to
help Barrett get his money.” Barrett finished the work and sent a $7,500 bill to Henderson, which was
never paid. When Barrett later sent the bill to Preferred Contractors, these facts emerged: Preferred
Contractors told him that due to Barrett’s failure to notify Preferred Contractors promptly of
Henderson’s non-payment, Preferred Contractors had already paid Henderson in full and therefore
would not pay twice for the work. Discuss the best possible theory of recovery Barrett may argue.
4. Rameriz and Cox enter a contract obligating Cox to supply Rameriz with 2,000 bushels of corn by the
end of September. Weather conditions are poor and Cox is unable to grow that much corn himself, but
could obtain enough to make up the required difference at a financial loss. Discuss the general purpose
of contracts and the result of seeking enforcement of this contract both in a court exercising judicial
restraint and in a court practicing judicial activism.
5. Briefly discuss how an offer can be accepted. Include offers for both bilateral and unilateral contracts.
ANS: