19. The Australian government has opened a for-profit tourist information center in New York City. If a
dispute arises over the lease of the storefront, may the landlord sue the Australian government in the
United States courts?
Yes, because the Australian government was engaged in a commercial activity.
No, because of the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act which forbids U.S. courts from
hearing any cases involving foreign governments.
It depends. The Australian government can only be sued if it signed a written waiver
giving up its immunity.
It depends. The Australian government can only be sued if it is a signatory on the CISG.
20. MagNet, a small United States computer company, started doing business in a foreign country. The
foreign country later decided to take over all computer industry, including MagNet’s operation. The
foreign country paid MagNet adequate compensation in United States dollars. The foreign country’s
action is called:
21. Kjell is the vice president of international sales for Oxtren, Inc, a U.S. company. To secure a
multimillion dollar contract for his company, Kjell paid a Mongolian governmental officer $10,000.
Kjell:
has violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
has not violated the Foreign Corrupt Practice Act because the payment was a grease
payment.
has not violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act because the government official was
from Mongolia, not the United States.
has not done anything illegal because Congress has not ratified the Convention of
Combatting Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Transactions.
22. The Marcel Company is opening an office in Mexico. The cost to obtain electrical service is $500, but
the clerk suggests that service could be started faster if an additional $50 is paid, which the clerk will
keep. If the Marcel official pays the additional $50:
he will have violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
he will not have violated the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act because this would be
considered a “grease” or facilitating payment, which is legal.
he will be guilty of violating the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act only if the payment was
illegal under the written law of Mexico.
he will be guilty of violating both the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the Convention of
Combatting Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions.