d. the abolition of federal parole
CASE 13.1
Throughout most of our nation’s history, the three broad constitutional provisions
dealing with trial by jury had little applicability in state courts. The U.S. Constitution
applied only to trials in federal courts. These practices changed dramatically, however,
when the Supreme Court decided Duncan v. Louisiana (1968), ruling that the jury
provisions of the Sixth Amendment were incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment to apply to state courts, as well. Subsequent decisions grappled
with the problem of defining the precise meaning of the right to trial by jury. The most
important issues concerned the scope of the right to a jury trial, the size of the jury, and
unanimous versus nonunanimous verdicts.
Which of the following defendants do not have a right to a jury trial?
a. homicide defendants facing a life sentence
b. shoplifting defendants facing 90 days in jail
c. burglary defendants facing 6 six years in jail
d. all of these defendants have a right to a jury trial
Severe defects in trial proceedings that require reversal of a conviction and remand for
a new trial in order to avoid a miscarriage of justice are called