Unlock access to all the studying documents.
View Full Document
In Illinois v. ____________, the Supreme Court allowed the use of drug dogs during
routine traffic stops.
Probationers and parolees have less Fourth Amendment protection than ordinary
citizens.
The Supreme Court held in Fellers v. U.S. that once the _________ Amendment’s right
to counsel attached, statements made by the defendant must be excluded if the police
“deliberately elicited” incriminating information from the defendant.
What are other ways, other than lineups, the police can make the identification of a
person as the perpetrator of a crime more reliable?
If the improper police conduct is a failure to give a Miranda warning, the courts always
apply the poisonous tree doctrine and suppress evidence obtained.
The Confrontation Clause applies in civil cases.
If evidence is obtained in a legitimate consent search, the _____________ rule does not
apply.
There were no rules about hearsay under the common law.
Discuss the Metropolitan Police Department of the District of Columbia (Washington,
DC) issued instructions in regard to the use of photographs and the photographic
array:
Presenting _____________ is the means of proving the existence or non-existence of a
disputed fact.
If there is more than one witness at a lineup, the witnesses should be allowed to confer
before making their identification.
Describe three inferences that judges and juries are not allowed to draw in criminal
trials. What are the reasons these are not permitted?
____________ is the result of evidence.
Under the Federal Rules of Evidence, admissions by a party opponent are always
defined as hearsay.
Discuss fully the scope of the privilege against self-incrimination. Be sure to provide
examples.
The corpus delicti rule requires that confessions be corroborated by accomplices.
In a recent study, it was found that all states use the Daubert for scientific validity.
Miranda requires that suspects be informed of the subject of the interrogation before the
interrogation begins.