Beginning in 1997 the Court began to face questions about regulating media on the
Internet. How, if in any way, do these cases differ from the print media cases decided in
Roth, Miller, and Ferber? Should these cases be decided differently or is the medium
not important and the same standards apply? Why or why not?
How does Yoder square with the Court’s decision in Prince?
Why is Justice Harlan’s dissent in Poe important? How, if at all, did it change the
Court’s view of substantive due process?
How did the Court define religion according to the Ballard test? Did this definition
broaden or contract religious freedom? Why?