In the cases in which school districts have prevailed in choosing more restrictive
placements for students with disabilities, Daniel R.R. v. El Paso (1989), Clyde K. v.
Puyallup School District (1994), and Hartmann v. Loudoun County Board of Education
(1997), what practices did the districts follow that made a positive outcome more
likely? What implications can be drawn from these cases to help school districts make
educational meaningful and legally correct decisions regarding LRE?
Does the LRE mandate of the IDEA apply to nonacademic programs and settings as
well as academic setting?
Describe the similarities and differences between the terms least restrictive environment
and inclusion.