Unlock access to all the studying documents.
View Full Document
1. The history of the textile industry raises important questions for economic policy.
2. Trade decisions are based on the principle of absolute advantage.
3. The sum of consumer and producer surplus measures the total benefits that buyers and sellers receive from participating
in a market.
4. According to the principle of comparative advantage, all countries can benefit from trading with one another because
trade allows each country to specialize in doing what it does best.
5. The world price of cotton is the highest price of cotton observed anywhere in the world.
6. If the world price of a good is greater than the domestic price in a country that can engage in international trade, then
that country becomes an importer of that good.
7. Without free trade, the domestic price of a good must be equal to the world price of a good.
8. The nation of Aviana soon will abandon its no-trade policy and adopt a free-trade policy. If the world price of goose
meat is $3 per pound and the domestic price of goose meat without trade is $2 per pound, then Aviana should export
goose meat.
9. If a country allows free trade and its domestic price for a given good is lower than the world price, then it will import
that good.
10. “Trade raises the economic well-being of a nation in the sense that the gains of the winners exceed the losses of the
losers.” This statement is correct for a nation that exports manufactured goods, but it is not correct for a nation that
imports manufactured goods.
11. The nation of Loneland does not allow international trade. In Loneland, you can buy 1 pound of beef for 2 pounds of
cheese. In neighboring countries, you can buy 2 pounds of beef for 3 pounds of cheese. If Loneland were to allow free
trade, it would export cheese.
12. If Argentina exports oranges to the rest of the world, Argentina’s producers of oranges are worse off, and Argentina’s
consumers of oranges are better off, as a result of trade.
13. If a country’s domestic price of a good is lower than the world price, then that country has a comparative advantage in
producing that good.
14. When a country allows international trade and becomes an importer of a good, domestic producers of the good are
better off, and domestic consumers of the good are worse off.
15. If the United Kingdom imports tea cups from other countries, then U.K. producers of tea cups are better off, and U.K.
consumers of tea cups are worse off, as a result of trade.
16. If Belgium exports chocolate to the rest of the world, then Belgian chocolate producers benefit from higher producer
surplus, Belgian chocolate consumers are worse off because of lower consumer surplus, and total surplus in Belgium
increases because of the exports of chocolate.
17. In principle, trade can make a nation better off, because the gains to the winners exceed the losses to the losers.
18. Suppose the Ivory Coast, a small country, imports wheat at the world price of $4 per bushel. If the Ivory Coast
imposes a tariff of $1 per bushel on imported wheat, then, other things equal, the price of wheat in Ivory Coast will
increase, but by less than $1.
19. The small-economy assumption is necessary to analyze the gains and losses from international trade.
20. The greater the elasticities of supply and demand, the smaller are the gains from trade.
21. If a tariff is placed on watches, the price of both domestic and imported watches will rise by the amount of the tariff.
22. When a government imposes a tariff on a product, the domestic price will equal the world price.
23. A tariff increases the quantity of imports and moves the market farther from its equilibrium without trade.
24. When a country abandons no-trade policies in favor of free-trade policies and becomes an importer of steel, then the
domestic price of steel will increase as a result.
25. When a country that imports shoes imposes a tariff on shoes, buyers of shoes in that country become worse off.
26. When a country that imports shoes imposes a tariff on shoes, buyers of shoes in that country become worse off and
sellers of shoes in that country become better off.
27. Deadweight loss measures the decrease in total surplus that results from a tariff or quota.
28. If a small country imposes a tariff on an imported good, domestic sellers will gain producer surplus, the government
will gain tariff revenue, and domestic consumers will gain consumer surplus.
29. Domestic consumers gain and domestic producers lose when the government imposes a tariff on imports.
30. The imposition of a tariff on imported wine will increase the domestic price of wine, decrease the quantity of wine
imported, and increase the quantity of wine produced domestically.
31. Suppose that Australia imposes a tariff on imported beef. If the increase in producer surplus is $100 million, the
increase in tariff revenue is $200 million, and the reduction in consumer surplus is $500 million, the deadweight loss of
the tariff is $300 million.
32. Suppose Ecuador imposes a tariff on imported bananas. If the increase in producer surplus is $50 million, the
reduction in consumer surplus is $150 million, and the deadweight loss of the tariff is $30 million, then the tariff generates
$130 million in revenue for the government.
33. Tariffs cause deadweight loss because they move the price of an imported product closer to the equilibrium without
trade, thus reducing the gains from trade.
34. Import quotas and tariffs both cause the quantity of imports to fall.
35. Import quotas and tariffs make domestic sellers better off and domestic buyers worse off.
36. If a country allows free trade and imports cars, then it is the case that the gains to domestic producers outweigh the
losses to domestic consumers.
37. The nation of Cranolia used to prohibit international trade, but now trade is allowed, and Cranolia is exporting
furniture. Relative to the previous no-trade situation, buyers of furniture in Cranolia are now better off.
38. The nation of Spritzland used to prohibit international trade, but now trade is allowed, and Spritzland is exporting
wristwatches. Relative to the previous no-trade situation, total surplus in the market for wristwatches in Spritzland has
increased.
39. Free trade allows firms to realize economies of scale, resulting in higher costs of production.
40. For a given country, comparing the world price of aluminum and the domestic price of aluminum before trade
indicates whether that country’s demand for aluminum exceeds the demand for aluminum in other countries.
41. For Country A, the world price of soybeans exceeds the domestic equilibrium price of soybeans. As a result,
international trade allows buyers of soybeans in Country A to experience greater consumer surplus than they otherwise
would experience.
42. For Country A, the world price of textiles exceeds the domestic equilibrium price of textiles. As a result, international
trade allows sellers of textiles in Country A to experience greater producer surplus than they otherwise would experience.
43. William and Jamal live in the country of Dumexia. As a result of Dumexia’s legalization of international trade in
bananas, William becomes better off and Jamal becomes worse off. It follows that William is a seller, and Jamal is a
buyer, of bananas.
44. William and Jamal live in the country of Dumexia. When Dumexia legalized international trade in bananas, the price
of bananas in Dumexia increased. As a result, William became better off and Jamal became worse off. It follows that
William is a seller, and Jamal is a buyer, of bananas.
45. Economists agree that trade ought to be restricted if free trade means that domestic jobs might be lost because of
foreign competition.
46. Free trade causes job losses in industries in which a country does not have a comparative advantage, but it also causes
job gains in industries in which the country has a comparative advantage.
47. Most economists support the infant-industry argument because it is so easy to implement in practice.
48. If Honduras were to subsidize the production of wool blankets and sell them in Sweden at artificially low prices, the
Swedish economy would be worse off.
49. Policymakers often consider trade restrictions in order to protect domestic producers from foreign competitors.
50. GATT is an example of a successful unilateral approach to achieving free trade.
51. NAFTA is an example of a multilateral approach to achieving free trade.
52. The rules established under the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) are enforced by an international
body called the World Trade Organization (WTO).
53. A multilateral approach to free trade has greater potential to increase the gains from trade than a unilateral approach,
because the multilateral approach can reduce trade restrictions abroad as well as at home.
54. Economists feel that national security concerns never provide a legitimate rationale for trade restrictions.
55. Economists view free trade as a way to raise living standards both at home and abroad.
56. The results of a 2008 Los Angeles Times poll suggest that a significant majority of Americans believe that free
international trade helps the American economy.
57. The results of a 2008 Los Angeles Times poll suggest that the percentage of Americans who believe trade is harmful to
the economy exceeds the percentage of Americans who believe trade is beneficial to the economy.
58. Most economists view the United States as an ongoing experiment that raises serious doubts about the virtues of free
trade.
59. If a country is exporting a good, this is because the country has an absolute advantage in the production of that good.
60. When markets open up to international trade, we know that consumer surplus will rise.
61. When markets open up to international trade, we know that total surplus will rise.
62. Since a tariff can increase employment in an industry, the result is a net increase in total surplus.
63. There are only increases in total surplus when a country exports a good, since more units of the country’s output of
that good are produced.
64. If we know that Canada exports maple syrup, we can conclude that maple syrup consumers in Canada are worse off
than they would be in the absence of trade.
65. Imposing a quota on the import of a good is preferable to a tariff because a tariff creates a deadweight loss while a
quota does not.
66. Imposing a tariff on the import of a good is preferable to a quota because a tariff produces revenue for the
government, while a quota never produces any revenue for a government.
67. The small country assumption is made in developing models of international trade because it applies to US markets.
68. We can conclude that international trade is beneficial because, regardless of whether the country imports or exports a
good, the overall increase in well-being outweighs the losses associated with trade.