Chapter 7/Consumers, Producers, and the Efficiency of Markets ❖ 79
98. At present, the maximum legal price for a human kidney is $0. The price of $0 maximizes
consumer surplus but not producer surplus.
producer surplus but not consumer surplus.
both consumer and producer surplus.
neither consumer nor producer surplus.
99. If the United States changed its laws to allow for the legal sale of a kidney, which of the following is likely to
occur?
The price of kidneys would rise to balance supply and demand.
The gains from trade would make both buyers and sellers better off.
Thousands of lives would be saved.
All of the above are correct.
100. If the United States changed its laws to allow for the legal sale of a kidney, which of the following is least
likely to occur?
The supply of kidneys would increase.
The shortage of kidneys would decrease.
Many lives would be saved.
The allocation of kidneys would be fair.
101. According to many economists, government restrictions on ticket scalping do all of the following except
inconvenience the public.
reduce the audience for cultural and sports events.
waste police officers’ time.
keep the cost of tickets to all consumers low.
102. Economists tend to see ticket scalping as
a way for a few to profit without producing anything of value.
an inequitable interference in the orderly process of ticket distribution.
a way of increasing the efficiency of ticket distribution.
an unproductive activity which should be made illegal everywhere.
103. Many economists believe that restrictions against ticket scalping result in each of the following except
a smaller audience for cultural and sporting events.
shorter lines at cultural and sporting events.
less tax revenue for the state.
an increase in ticket prices.