92 ❖ Chapter 7/Consumers, Producers, and the Efficiency of Markets
52. Economists generally believe that, although there may be advantages to society from ticket-scalping, the costs
to society of this activity outweigh the benefits.
53. Economists argue that restrictions against ticket scalping actually drive up the cost of many tickets.
54. Ticket scalping can increase total surplus in the market for tickets to sporting events.
55. If the United States legally allowed for a market in transplant organs, it is estimated that one kidney would sell
for at least $100,000.
56. Even though participants in the economy are motivated by self-interest, the “invisible hand” of the market-
place guides this self-interest into promoting general economic well-being.
57. The current policy on kidney donation effectively sets a price ceiling of zero.
58. Wendy is willing to pay $50 for a concert ticket and Bruce would like to receive $25. If the market price is
$40 for this transaction, then the total surplus would be $15.
59. Suppose you sell a kayak for $600, but you were willing to sell it for $450. The buyer was willing to pay
$650. The total surplus is $200.
60. If a market is in equilibrium, then it is impossible for a social planner to raise economic welfare by increasing
or decreasing the quantity of the good.
61. Unless markets are perfectly competitive, they may fail to maximize the total benefits to buyers and sellers.