169. If Japan imposes a quota on imports of rice, the effect will be
less rice and higher price in Japan, lower rice prices in exporting countries.
more rice and higher price in Japan, higher rice prices in exporting countries.
less rice and lower price in Japan, higher rice prices in exporting countries.
more rice and lower price in Japan, lower rice prices in exporting countries.
less rice and higher price in Japan, higher rice prices in exporting countries.
170. A restriction of imports that is accomplished by a quota normally
can be accomplished also by a tariff.
cannot be replicated exactly by imposing a tariff.
can be accomplished also by an export subsidy.
can be accomplished also by negotiations within GATT.
171. A country that must inhibit imports should give preference to
quotas over tariffs because quotas are less likely to distort trade patterns between nations.
tariffs over quotas because, unlike quotas, tariffs offer no special benefits to inefficient exporters.
export subsidies over quotas or tariffs because export subsidies can protect a nation’s domestic producers.
an embargo wherever possible because an embargo can serve as a political weapon in addition to being a
“trade stopper.”
172. A tariff is better than a quota because
it does not distort trade as much.
tariffs produce tax revenue.