Chapter 29 – The Economics of Race and Sex Discrimination
22. If, in the experience of a manager of a large company who hires for hundreds of positions per
year, whites are more likely than blacks to leave within a year, then a manager who hires
only blacks to save money is
A) employing statistical discrimination.
B) perfectly within his rights.
C) violating the law.
D) employing statistical discrimination and violating the law.
23. Suppose a plant has 1000 employees, half of whom are from a minority population. Suppose
further that, in order to cut costs, a manager must layoff 100 employees. If she chooses only
non-minority workers to layoff because an analysis of productivity data suggests they are, on
average 5% less efficient then she is
A) on perfectly sound legal ground.
B) using statistical discrimination and it is legal.
C) using inferential discrimination and it is illegal.
D) using statistical discrimination and it is illegal.
24. Statistical discrimination is “rational” in the sense that it is consistent with profit
maximization,
A) as a result it is legal.
B) as a result it is illegal.
C) so it is weighed by the courts, against how bad it looks.
D) but if statistical evidence is used to exclusively hire or fire one race or another it is illegal.
25. Treating two otherwise equal people differently because of their gender or race is called
A) statistical discrimination.
B) disparate treatment discrimination.
C) rational discrimination.
D) adverse impact discrimination.
26. Doing something that is not necessarily discriminatory on its face, but is motivated by
reference to well-established empirical regularities is
A) statistical discrimination.
B) disparate treatment discrimination.
C) rational discrimination.
D) adverse impact discrimination.