are driven by both fairness and self-interest.
have trouble calculating their own levels of wealth.
48. Suppose that an economics professor selects two students, Audrey and Michael, to participate in a classroom
experiment. The professor gives Audrey twenty $1 bills. Audrey must pick an allocation of the twenty $1 bills to offer to
Michael. If Michael accepts the allocation, each student keeps his or her portion of the money. If Michael rejects the
allocation, the professor keeps the $20, and each student receives nothing. Audrey selects $19 for herself and $1 for
Michael. Based on the studies of human decision making, which of the following statements is correct?
If Michael accepts the offer, he is behaving rationally.
If Michael rejects the offer, he may value fairness more than $1.
If Michael rejects the offer, Audrey made a bad choice by trying to keep $19 for herself.
Any of the above could be correct.
49. Anthony and Addie are playing the ultimatum game, starting with $100. The coin flip results in Anthony being the one
to propose a division of the $100. Anthony proposes that he gets $99 and Addie gets $1. Which of the following
statements is correct?
Because the 99-1 split isn’t fair, Anthony should not make this offer.
Conventional economic theory predicts that Anthony will propose a 99-1 split, just as he did.
Experimental evidence suggests that Addie will accept the 99-1 split because, even though it isn’t fair, it’s
better than nothing.
Economic theory predicts that Anthony should choose a 60–40 split to maximize his payoff.
50. Bill and Bev are playing the ultimatum game, starting with $50. A coin flip results in Bev being the one to propose a
division of the $50. If Bev acts as economic theory assumes, she should propose that
she gets $30 and Bill gets $20.
she gets $25 and Bill gets $25.