53. Refer to Table 22–7. If the first vote pits a 2–way stop against a 4-way stop and the second vote pits a stoplight
against the winner of the first vote, then the outcome is as follows:
2-way stop wins the first vote and 2-way stop wins the second vote, so the town installs a 2-way stop.
2-way stop wins the first vote and stoplight wins the second vote, so the town installs a stoplight.
4-way stop wins the first vote and 4-way stop wins the second vote, so the town installs a 4-way stop.
4-way stop wins the first vote and stoplight wins the second vote, so the town installs a stoplight.
54. Refer to Table 22–7. If the first vote pits a 2–way stop against a stoplight and the second vote pits a 4-way stop
against the winner of the first vote, then the outcome is as follows:
2-way stop wins the first vote and 2-way stop wins the second vote, so the town installs a 2-way stop.
2-way stop wins the first vote and 4-way stop wins the second vote, so the town installs a 4-way stop.
Stoplight wins the first vote and stoplight wins the second vote, so the town installs a stoplight.
Stoplight wins the first vote and 4–way stop wins the second vote, so the town installs a 4-way stop.
55. Refer to Table 22-7. Which of the following statements is correct regarding the Condorcet paradox and the results of
pairwise voting on how to improve the safety of the intersection?
The paradox implies that pairwise voting never produces transitive preferences, and so the voting in the town
fails to produce transitive preferences.
The paradox implies that pairwise voting sometimes (but not always) fails to produce transitive preferences,
but the voting in the town does produce transitive preferences.
The paradox implies that pairwise voting sometimes (but not always) fails to produce transitive preferences,
and the voting in the town fails to produce transitive preferences.
The paradox implies that pairwise voting always produces transitive preferences, and so the voting in the town
produces transitive preferences.