Chapter 20B
10. Cutech issued a $150 million of a 20-year, 10.5% debt 5 years ago. Since then, Cutech’s financial conditions
have improved and management believes that they could refund the old issue with a new 15-year, 7.5% issue.
The old debt is now callable at 104 percent of par and issuance costs on the new issue would be 0.6 percent. The
unamortized issuance costs on the old issue are $675,000. If Cutech calls the old issue and refunds it, both issues
would be outstanding for a two-week period. If the company’s marginal tax rate is 40%, should Cutech refund the
old issue?
a. Yes, NPV = $43,645,599
b. Yes, NPV = $43,798,975
c. Yes, NPV = $44,364,538
d. No, NPV is negative
11. In considering the bond refunding analysis, which of the following statements is/are correct?
I. The marginal rate of return is used as the discount rate
II. Bond refunding is most prevalent during a period of high inflation.
a. Only statement I is correct
b. Only statement II is correct
c. Both statements I and II are correct
d. Neither statement I nor II is correct
12. Waste Deep Disposal Services are considering refunding a $525,000,000 bond issue. The old bonds have a
7.25% coupon rate. The new bonds will have a 6% coupon rate. Both issues will be outstanding for about four
weeks. What is the overlapping interest if the company is in the 38% tax bracket (rounded)?
a. $1,517,465
b. $1,815,288
c. $1,357,642
d. $1,225,427