26. Suppose a paper mill earns $1,000,000 in profits when it pollutes a river, and it can abate
pollution at a cost of $120,000. The effects of the pollution are confined to a single farmer who
earns $400,000 if the water he uses from the river is clean, and $300,000 if it’s polluted. Suppose
there is no law preventing the firm from polluting the river. Which of the following describes an
efficient outcome in this case?
D. The farmer pays the owner of the mill $90,000 to stop polluting.
27. Suppose a paper mill earns $1,000,000 in profits when it pollutes a river, and it can abate
pollution at a cost of $120,000. The effects of the pollution are confined to a single farmer who
earns $400,000 if the water he uses from the river is clean, and $300,000 if it’s polluted. Suppose
the law guarantees the farmer access to clean water from the river. Which of the following
describes an efficient outcome in this case?
A. The owner of the mill is unable to pay the farmer enough to secure his permission to pollute
the river.