(Ref 2-2 Figure: Guns and Butter) Use Figure: Guns and Butter. This production
possibility frontier is:
bowed out because of increasing opportunity costs.
bowed in because of increasing opportunity costs.
bowed in because of constant costs of guns and butter.
linear because of constant costs.
(Ref 2-2 Figure: Guns and Butter) Use Figure: Guns and Butter. If the economy is
operating at point B, producing 16 guns and 12 pounds of butter per period, a decision to
move to point E and produce 18 pounds of butter:
indicates that you can have more butter and guns simultaneously.
makes it clear that this economy has decreasing opportunity costs.
necessitates a loss of 8 guns per period.
necessitates a loss of 4 guns per period.
(Ref 2-2 Figure: Guns and Butter) Use Figure: Guns and Butter. The combination of
guns and butter at point H:
can be attained but would cost too much.
cannot be attained, given the level of technology and the factors of production
available.
has no meaning since it does not relate to the preferences of consumers.
is attainable but would increase unemployment.
(Ref 2-2 Figure: Guns and Butter) Use Figure: Guns and Butter. Suppose the economy
produced 8 guns and 12 pounds of butter per period. Given that, which statement is
true?
This is a possible choice, but it is inefficient.
This combination invalidates the notion of increasing opportunity cost.
The economy is still efficient but does not buy as much as it could.
Something must be done to reduce the amount of employment.
If an economy has to sacrifice only one unit of good X for each unit of good Y produced
throughout the relevant range, then its production possibility frontier has a(n):
increasing negative slope.
decreasing negative slope.