4) The Internet has made it possible to compare lots of prices without incurring a lot of cost. This
A) has given firms added market power to price discriminate.
B) has significantly reduced search cost and made markets more competitive.
C) has enabled firms to charge higher prices to consumers with computers.
D) has only affected technology markets.
5) the Internet has made it possible to compare lots of prices without incurring a lot of cost. If internet
access is unequally distributed throughout the population one would expect
A) consumers with internet access to pay a higher price.
B) consumers without internet access to pay a lower price.
C) price discrimination against consumers without internet access.
D) firms to charge the same price to all consumers.
6) As long as there is asymmetric information among consumers and positive search cost, if price is below
the monopoly price and the same across all firms, then a competitive firm
A) can always profit from raising its price.
B) can always profit from lowering its price.
C) can profit from raising its price but by no more than the search cost.
D) can profit from lowering its price but by no more than the search cost.
7) New smart phone applications are developed to help consumers find the cheapest prices in the
neighborhood. As a result,
A) firms get greater market power.
B) consumers’ search costs are greatly lowered.
C) firms are able to charge higher prices.
D) only smart markets become more competitive.
8) New smart phone applications are developed to help consumers find the cheapest prices in the
neighborhood. Therefore,
A) the local competitive will become more intensive.
B) the prices of goods listed in the application will be lowered.
C) price discrimination will occur against consumers without a smart phone or this application.
D) All of the above.