7. A risk-averse manager is hired to run a firm for shareholders. If the manager’s effort can be observed and specified in a
contract, which would be the best employment contract?
a high-powered incentive contract to elicit the most effort.
a fixed salary paid as long as the required effort is undertaken.
a proportion of profits paid as long as the required effort is undertaken.
a wage well in excess of his or her outside opportunity.
8. A risk-averse manager is hired to run a firm for shareholders. If shareholders cannot observe the manager’s effort,
which would be the best employment contract?
a high-powered incentive contract to elicit maximum effort.
a moderately powered incentive scheme that elicits some effort without exposing the manager to too much
risk.
an incentive scheme that provides maximum incentives and maximum insurance.
9. Given a series of contracts offered to an executive having the same slope (where slope refers to how the contract varies
with changes in the firm’s gross profits) but different intercepts (referring to the overall generosity of the contract).
Which of these is not a consideration in figuring out which of these intercepts the shareholders would decide to build into
the contract offered to the executive?
if too generous a contract is offered, this comes out of the firm’s bottom-line profit.
if too generous a contract is offered, the executive may become lazy and not exert the required effort.
if the contract isn’t generous enough, the executive will decide to work elsewhere.
if the contract isn’t generous enough, only low-ability executives will apply.
10. Which are social costs associated with the inability of shareholders to observe an executive’s effort? (You may
choose more than one.)
Excessive insurance offered.
The executive has to be exposed to risk to induce effort, and risk is costly.
The executive ends up exerting less than first-best effort.
Excessive effort induced.
11. A monopoly coffee shop is deciding on a menu of different cup sizes to sell to a population of consumers, some of
whom are high demanders and some low demanders. How would the optimal menu differ depending on whether the
consumers can be observably separated into the different types or not?
The menu is unaffected by type observability.
If types aren’t observable, the large cup size should be increased to separate the high demander.
If types aren’t observable, the small cup size should be increased to make it more attractive to low demanders.
If types aren’t observable, the small cup size should be reduced to make it less attractive to high demanders.
1