efficient because of the free entry assumption.
inefficient because some mutually beneficial transactions will be foregone.
inefficient because of the uncertainties inherent in the game.
7. The Nash equilibrium in a Bertrand game of price setting where all firms have different marginal cost is:
efficient because all mutually beneficial transactions will occur.
efficient because of the free entry assumption.
inefficient because some mutually beneficial transactions will be foregone.
inefficient because of the uncertainties inherent in the game.
8. Product differentiation complicates the study of oligopolies because such markets may not:
have prices equal to marginal cost.
have free entry and exit.
obey the law of one price.
9. In the Hotelling model of spatial competition, profits arise from:
rents based on locational advantage.
the ability to price discriminate.
increasing returns to scale.
10. In the Hotelling model, what effect would an increase in the transportation cost t have on, in the first instance, a
monopoly firm and, in the second instance, two firms located at the extremes of the line segment who compete over the
marginal consumer?
The monopolist’s profit would decrease but the duopolists’ would increase.
Both monopolist’s and duopolists’ profits would increase.
Both monopolist’s and duopolists’ profits would decrease.
The monopolist’s profit would increase but the duopolists’ would decrease.
11. What factor would not help resolve the Bertrand paradox (that a perfectly competitive outcome can emerge with as
few as two firms in the market) if the basic Bertrand model were extended to include it?