Unlock document.
This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
1. It is important to understand oligopoly markets because:
a.
although few real world markets are oligopolies, their existence raises interesting theoretical questions.
b.
oligopolies typically generate more deadweight loss than monopolies.
c.
oligopolies can generate a whole range of possible outcomes between monopoly and perfect competition.
d.
one can predict the market outcome exactly just by knowing the number of firms in the market.
2. Which feature of a market would contribute most to overall social welfare?
a.
Low prices and high outputs
b.
Reduction in costs due to technological improvements
c.
The invention of new products
d.
Difficult to weigh a, b, and c without further information about society's preferences
3. In a Cournot equilibrium, each firm chooses an output level which:
a.
maximizes joint profits.
b.
maximizes the price received.
c.
maximizes profits given what the other firms produce.
d.
maximizes revenue given what the other firms produce.
4. A firm's first-order condition from the Cournot game with general demands and costs is:
a.
.
b.
.
c.
.
d.
.
5. The Nash equilibrium of the Cournot game in which two identical firms face market demand and
have costs is given by :
a.
50.0.
b.
41.7.
c.
31.5.
d.
27.8.
6. The Nash equilibrium in a Bertrand game in which firms produce perfect substitutes and have equal marginal costs is:
a.
efficient because all mutually beneficial transactions will occur.
b.
efficient because of the free entry assumption.
c.
inefficient because some mutually beneficial transactions will be foregone.
d.
inefficient because of the uncertainties inherent in the game.
7. The Nash equilibrium in a Bertrand game of price setting where all firms have different marginal cost is:
a.
efficient because all mutually beneficial transactions will occur.
b.
efficient because of the free entry assumption.
c.
inefficient because some mutually beneficial transactions will be foregone.
d.
inefficient because of the uncertainties inherent in the game.
8. Product differentiation complicates the study of oligopolies because such markets may not:
a.
be efficient.
b.
have prices equal to marginal cost.
c.
have free entry and exit.
d.
obey the law of one price.
9. In the Hotelling model of spatial competition, profits arise from:
a.
monopoly power.
b.
rents based on locational advantage.
c.
the ability to price discriminate.
d.
increasing returns to scale.
10. In the Hotelling model, what effect would an increase in the transportation cost t have on, in the first instance, a
monopoly firm and, in the second instance, two firms located at the extremes of the line segment who compete over the
marginal consumer?
a.
The monopolist's profit would decrease but the duopolists' would increase.
b.
Both monopolist's and duopolists' profits would increase.
c.
Both monopolist's and duopolists' profits would decrease.
d.
The monopolist's profit would increase but the duopolists' would decrease.
11. What factor would not help resolve the Bertrand paradox (that a perfectly competitive outcome can emerge with as
few as two firms in the market) if the basic Bertrand model were extended to include it?
a.
Repeated interaction
b.
Search costs
c.
Sequential moves
d.
Product differentiation
12. How does the leader's behavior in the quantity-leadership (Stackelberg) game compare to that in the analogous price-
leadership game?
a.
It behaves as a "puppy dog" in both.
b.
It behaves as a "top dog" in the quantity leadership game but a "puppy dog" in the price leadership game.
c.
It behaves as a "top dog" in the quantity leadership game but a "puppy dog" in the price leadership game.
d.
It behaves as a "top dog" in both.
13. A profit-maximizing firm should spend an additional dollar on advertising so long as this expenditure results in more
than one dollar of:
a.
additional sales.
b.
reduced costs.
c.
increased profits.
d.
demand.
14. The subgame-perfect equilibrium of a two-stage game in which firms first choose capacities and then engage in a
Bertrand price setting game resembles the equilibrium in:
a.
the competitive model.
b.
the Cournot model.
c.
the cartel model.
d.
the price leadership model.
15. All of the following are problems associated with maintaining a cartel except that:
a.
cartels are illegal.
b.
a large amount of information is needed to coordinate a cartel.
c.
profits are not maximized by a cartel so it will evolve into a monopoly.
d.
each member of the cartel has an incentive to "chisel" by expanding output.
16. Each firm in a cartel has an incentive to chisel because market price exceeds:
a.
marginal cost.
b.
average cost.
c.
average variable cost.
d.
average fixed cost.
17. A cartel-like collusive solution can be a Nash equilibrium only in price-setting games with:
a.
infinite replications.
b.
finite replications.
c.
dominant strategies.
d.
more than two players.
18. Suppose n identical firms engage in Bertrand competition in a stage game repeated infinitely often. What condition on
the discount factor is required for firms to be able to tacitly collude on the monopoly industry output?
a.
.
b.
.
c.
.
d.
.
19. The Stackelberg outcome differs from the Cournot equilibrium because:
a.
the games involve different strategic variables.
b.
the first mover can commit to an output off its best-response function.
c.
quantity supplied is not equal to quantity demanded at the prevailing price.
d.
it's not a perfectly competitive outcome.
20. The more a firm invests in a new production technology, the lower its marginal costs. Which of the following
scenarios involving this incumbent firm and a potential entrant makes the least economic sense?
a.
The incumbent overinvests to deter entry when this investment is observable to the entrant.
b.
The incumbent overinvests to deter entry when this investment is unobservable to the entrant.
c.
The incumbent underinvests to accommodate entry when this investment is observable and they compete in
prices.
d.
The incumbent overinvests to accommodate entry when this investment is observable and they compete in
quantities.
21. Which of the following factors might explain why the long-run equilibrium number of firms can in some instances
exceed the socially optimal number?
a.
The appropriability effect (the increase in consumers surplus following entry is not "appropriated" by
entrants).
b.
The feedback effect (an increase in the number of firms increases the competitiveness of the market).
c.
The business-stealing effect (entry reduces rival firms' profits, a social loss that entrants do not account for).
d.
The ratchet effect (the more profits the entrants earn, the more the stockholders expect them to earn in the
future).
