increase the equilibrium quantity of labor
input and real GDP.
leave the equilibrium quantity of labor
input and real GDP unchanged.
lower the equilbirum quantity of labor
input and increase real GDP.
lower the equilibrium quantity of labor
input and real GDP.
61. In the price-misperceptions model, an increase in the price level in the short-run
decreases the equilibrium quantity of labor
input and capital services.
leaves the equilibrium quantity of labor
input and capital services unchanged.
increases the equilibrium quantity of labor
input and capital services.
increases the equilibrium quantity of labor
input and decreases the equilibrium
quantity of capital services.
62. In the price-misperceptions model, an increase in the price level in the long-run
decreases the equilibrium quantity of labor
input and capital services.
increases the equilibrium quantity of labor
input and decreases the equilibrium
quantity of capital services.
increases the equilibrium quantity of labor
input and capital services.
leaves the equilibrium quantity of labor
input and capital services unchanged.
63. The Lucas hypothesis on monetary shocks says that the real effect of a given size monetary shock is
larger, the more stable the underlying
monetary environment.
larger, the less stable the underlying
monetary environment.
smaller, the more stable the underlying
monetary environment.
independent of the stability of the
underlying moentary environment.
64. Empirical evidence shows that, for countries such as the U.S., a monetary shock has
little or no relation to real GDP.
little or no relation to nominal GDP.
a significant positive relation to real GDP.
a signficant negative relation to real GDP.
65. In the price-misperception model, money is
endogenous, just as it is in the equilibrium
business-cycle model.
exogenous, but it is endogenous in the
equilibrium business-cycle model.
exogenous, just as it is in the equilibrium
business-cycle model.
endogenous, but it is exogenous in the
equilibrium business-cycle model.
66. Friedman and Schwartz’s Monetary History concludes that the procyclical pattern for money
does not exist in historical data for the
U.S. from 1867 to 1960.
cannot be explained entirely by
endogenous money.
can only be explained during the times the
U.S. used a commodity money.
can be explained entirely by exogenous
money.
67. One reason for preferring a rule for monetary policy is that a rule