10. Ms. Quasimodo in Problem 3 has the utility function U(x, m) = 100x − x2/2 + m, where x is her
consumption of earplugs and m is money left over to spend on other stuff. If she has $10,000 to spend
on earplugs and other stuff and if the price of earplugs rises from $50 to $70, then her net consumer’s
surplus
11. Bernice in Problem 5 has the utility function u(x, y) = min x, y, where x is the number of pairs of
earrings she buys per week and y is the number of dollars per week she has left to spend on other
things. (We allow the possibility that she buys fractional numbers of pairs of earrings per week.) If she
originally had an income of $17 per week and was paying a price of $3 per pair of earrings, then if the
price of earrings rose to $7, the compensating variation of that price change (measured in dollars per
week) would be closest to
12. Bernice in Problem 5 has the utility function u(x, y) = minx, y, where x is the number of pairs of
earrings she buys per week and y is the number of dollars per week she has left to spend on other
things. (We allow the possibility that she buys fractional numbers of pairs of earrings per week.) If she
originally had an income of $20 per week and was paying a price of $2 per pair of earrings, then if the
price of earrings rose to $5, the compensating variation of that price change (measured in dollars per
week) would be closest to
13. Bernice in Problem 5 has the utility function u(x, y) = minx, y, where x is the number of pairs of
earrings she buys per week and y is the number of dollars per week she has left to spend on other
things. (We allow the possibility that she buys fractional numbers of pairs of earrings per week.) If she
originally had an income of $18 per week and was paying a price of $8 per pair of earrings, then if the
price of earrings rose to $14, the compensating variation of that price change (measured in dollars per
week) would be closest to