85. If large numbers of young Americans thought the life of a cowhand was great (despite the hardships),
we would expect
an increase in the wages of cowhands.
a decrease in the wages of cowhands because supply would be enlarged.
no impact on wages, which are determined by supply and demand, not preferences.
a decrease in the wages of cowhands because demand would be reduced.
86. If customers are racist but employers are not, then employment discrimination will be
less profitable than nondiscrimination.
more profitable than nondiscrimination.
equally profitable as nondiscrimination.
easier to eliminate than if employers were racist but customers were not.
87. Under a tournament pay scheme, the pay gap between a few “winners” (those who receive big
promotions) and other employees exceeds the productivity differences between these two groups. The
reason firms might use such a scheme is that they
overestimate the productivity of those who receive big promotions and inadvertently pay
them “too much.”
gain tax advantages by paying a few workers large salaries and using fringe benefits to
compensate the rest of the employees.
hope to raise the productivity of those who receive big promotions because marginal
productivity adjusts to equal wages.
hope to raise the productivity of all other workers, who will work harder trying to gain a
big promotion.
88. Sue: “I much prefer eating at the El Grande Mexican Restaurant to the others in town because all of
their employees are Mexican and speak Spanish. It gives the place a real ‘authentic’ feel.” Which of the
following is true about the above statement?
This is an example of customer-based discrimination for one group of employees over
another.
Despite customer preferences, we would expect the restaurants in town to hire equally
from all racial and ethnic groups.
If many customers felt the same way Sue does, there would be pressure for firms to satisfy
this consumer preference in their hiring.
Both a and c are correct.