Unlock access to all the studying documents.
View Full Document
1. When goods are available free of charge, the market forces that normally allocate resources in our economy are absent.
2. Free goods are usually efficiently allocated without government intervention.
3. Most goods in our economy are allocated in markets, where buyers pay for what they receive and sellers are paid for
what they provide.
4. Government intervention cannot improve the allocation of resources for goods that do not have prices attached to them.
5. A good that is excludable but not rival is known as a club good.
6. National Public Radio would be considered a club good.
7. Concerts in arenas are not excludable because it is virtually impossible to prevent someone from seeing the show.
8. A pair of jeans is rival but non-excludable.
9. A good that is rival in consumption is one that someone can be prevented from using if she did not pay for it.
10. A good that is excludable is one that someone can be prevented from using if she did not pay for it.
11. Some goods can be classified as either public goods or private goods depending on the circumstances.
12. Roads can be considered either public goods or common resources, depending on how congested they are.
13. You and your friends watch a movie in your bedroom. For you and your friends, the enjoyment that you get from
watching the movie is not rival in consumption.
14. You and your friends eat potato chips in your bedroom. For you and your friends, the potato chips are rival in
consumption.
15. All goods that are excludable are also rival in consumption, but not all goods that are rival in consumption are
excludable.
16. Common resources and public goods have in common that they are not excludable and they are not rival in
consumption.
17. Private goods and club goods have in common that they are excludable, but are different in that private goods are rival
while club goods are not rival in consumption.
18. When one person enjoys the benefit of a tornado siren, she reduces the benefit to others.
19. A free-rider is someone who receives the benefit of a good but avoids paying for it.
20. A free rider is a person who pays for a good but does not receive the benefit of it.
21. The free-rider problem arises when the number of beneficiaries is large and exclusion of any of them is impossible.
22. When free riders are present in a market, the market generally fails to provide the efficient outcome.
23. Even economists who advocate small government agree that national defense is a good that the government should
provide.
24. Although national defense is currently a public good, economists who advocate small government generally agree that
the U.S. should privatize national defense to increase the efficiency of the good.
25. One benefit of the patent system is that it encourages the production of technical knowledge.
26. Government agencies, such as the National Science Foundation, subsidize basic research because in the absence of a
subsidy too little research would be conducted.
27. Because the benefits of basic research are obvious and easy to measure, it is likely that the public sector pays for the
right amount and the right kinds of basic research.
28. In some cases the government can make everyone better off by raising taxes to pay for certain goods that the market
fails to provide.
29. The free-rider problem makes it unlikely that poverty will be entirely eliminated through private charity.
30. Advocates of antipoverty programs claim that fighting poverty is a public good.
31. Private markets usually provide lighthouses because ship captains have the incentive to navigate using the lighthouse
and therefore will pay for the service.
32. Some goods, such as lighthouses, can switch between being public goods and being private goods depending on the
circumstances.
33. A study that compares the costs and benefits to society of providing a public good is called externality analysis.
34. In determining whether and how much of a public good to provide, cost-benefits analysts use the same type of price
signals for public goods as are readily available for private goods.
35. Economists argue that we can calculate the value of a human life by observing voluntary risks that people take every
day.
36. If we can conclude that human life has a finite value, cost-benefit analysis can lead to solutions in which human life is
worth less than the cost of a potential project.
37. Aristotle writes, “What is common to many is taken least care of, for all men have greater regard for what is their own
than for what they possess in common with others.” In this statement, Aristotle is referring to the free-rider problem that
occurs when a person receives the benefit of a good without paying for it.
38. One solution to the “Tragedy of the Commons” is to turn the common resource into a private good.
39. An example of the “Tragedy of the Commons” is litter in the picnic area of a local park.
40. London drivers who choose to drive in “congestion zones” pay a tax designed to reduce traffic congestion.
41. Governments that chose to make endangered elephants private goods have met with more success protecting elephants
than governments that chose to make killing elephants illegal.
42. One person’s use of common resources does not reduce the enjoyment other people receive from the resource.
43. If Dave and Jesse are the only two fishermen in town and neither is bothered by the other’s fishing, the lake they fish
in is not a common resource.
44. One possible solution to the problem of protecting a common resource is to convert that resource to a private good.
45. Tolls are not effective in altering people’s incentives to drive during rush hour.
46. The profit motive that stems from private ownership means that elephant populations are best protected as common
resources.
47. In the Tragedy of the Commons, joint action among the individual citizens would be necessary to solve their common
resource problem unless the government intervenes.
48. Depending on congestion, national parks can be either a common resource or a public good.
49. Pollution is a negative externality, but it is not appropriate to view the problem of pollution as a common-resource
50. The pollution market failure is an example of the free rider problem.
51. When a highway is congested, giving rise to negative externalities, it is appropriate to view the highway as a common
resource.
52. Nontoll roads can be either public goods or common resources, depending upon the degree of congestion.
53. Markets may fail to allocate resources efficiently when property rights are not well established.
54. A traffic light would be considered a common resource.
Table 11-6
Consider the city of Widgetapolis with only four residents, John, James, Mary, and Lydia. The four residents are trying to
determine how many hours to spend in cleaning up the public lake. The table below shows each resident’s willingness to
pay for each hour of cleaning.
55.
Refer to Table 11–6. Suppose the cost to clean the lake is $12 per hour and that the residents have agreed to split the cost
of cleaning the lake equally. The number of cleaning hours that maximizes total surplus of Widgetapolis is 7 hours.
56. Refer to Table 11–6. Suppose the cost to clean the lake is $8 per hour and that the residents have agreed to split the
cost of cleaning the lake equally. The number of cleaning hours that maximizes total surplus of Widgetapolis is 7 hours.
57. Refer to Table 11–6. Suppose the cost to clean the lake is $32 per hour and that the residents have agreed to split the
cost of cleaning the lake equally. It would maximize Lydia’s surplus if 6 hours of cleaning is done.
58. Refer to Table 11–6. Suppose the cost to clean the lake is $32 per hour and that the residents have agreed to split the
cost of cleaning the lake equally. It would maximize Mary’s surplus if 3 hours of cleaning is done.