very little up until now.
substantial, as greater productivity per acre reduced the need for farmland.
substantial; the productivity of much farm land has been destroyed by new technologies
and may never be useful again.
to make farmland less productive over time as the minerals In the soil are used up.
30. Researcher Indur Goklany has estimated that if traditional technologies, like those used in 1961, were
still in use, other things equal, wildlife habitat
would be more abundant and far healthier today.
would have increased, benefiting wildlife substantially.
would have declined substantially, as the need for farmland would not have declined as it
did.
would have been unaffected.
31. When a highly valued resource cannot be easily traded, as is often true with water flowing in a river,
then
it will not be hoarded by the rich, but will be available to all on an equal basis.
we can expect shortages from time to time, and conflicts over access to its use.
its price will be low as a result.
markets in the resource will clear more easily, without greed and profit to get in the way.
32. Water shortages are usually the result of
profit-seeking owners of the resource holding water off the market and refusing to trade.
bad forecasts by water planners.
monopoly fixing of water prices.
a lack of tradeable property rights in water.
33. When water cannot be traded among current and potential users, then
each user will take more care to conserve, because added water cannot be obtained.
users have a strong incentive to conserve because they are now protected from price
increases imposed by greedy entrepreneurs.
efficiency improves, as dry years can be better anticipated and planned for, and every user
knows the quantity that will be available.
water will not flow to its highest valued uses, and some users will use water for relatively
low-valued uses, because they cannot gain by selling it to others.