Chapter 11/Public Goods and Common Resources ❖ 61
34. In determining whether and how much of a public good to provide, cost-benefits analysts use the same type of
price signals for public goods as are readily available for private goods.
35. Economists argue that we can calculate the value of a human life by observing voluntary risks that people take
every day.
36. If we can conclude that human life has a finite value, cost–benefit analysis can lead to solutions in which hu-
man life is worth less than the cost of a potential project.
37. Aristotle writes, “What is common to many is taken least care of, for all men have greater regard for what is
their own than for what they possess in common with others.” In this statement, Aristotle is referring to the
free-rider problem that occurs when a person receives the benefit of a good without paying for it.
38. One solution to the “Tragedy of the Commons” is to turn the common resource into a private good.
39. An example of the “Tragedy of the Commons” is litter in the picnic area of a local park.
40. London drivers who choose to drive in “congestion zones” pay a tax designed to reduce traffic congestion.
41. Governments that chose to make endangered elephants private goods have met with more success protecting
elephants than governments that chose to make killing elephants illegal.
42. One person’s use of common resources does not reduce the enjoyment other people receive from the resource.
43. If Dave and Jesse are the only two fishermen in town and neither is bothered by the other’s fishing, the lake
they fish in is not a common resource.