55.
Cranberry Corp. has two divisions of equal size: a computer manufacturing division and a data processing
division.
Its CFO believes that stand-alone data processor companies typically have a WACC of 8%, while
stand-alone
computer manufacturers typically have a 12% WACC. He also believes that the data processing
and manufacturing
divisions have the same risk as their typical peers. Consequently, he estimates that the
composite, or corporate,
WACC is 10%. A consultant has suggested using an 8% hurdle rate for the data
processing division and a 12%
hurdle rate for the manufacturing division. However, the CFO disagrees, and he
has assigned a 10% WACC to all
projects in both divisions. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a.
While the decision to use just one WACC will result in its accepting more projects in the manufacturing
division and fewer projects in its data processing division than if it followed the consultant’s recommendation,
this should not affect the firm’s intrinsic value.
b.
The decision not to adjust for risk means, in effect, that it is favoring the data processing division. Therefore,
that division is likely to become a larger part of the consolidated company over time.
c.
The decision not to adjust for risk means that the company will accept too many projects in the manufacturing
division and too few in the data processing division. This will lead to a reduction in the firm’s intrinsic value
over time.
d.
The decision not to risk-adjust means that the company will accept too many projects in the data processing
business and too few projects in the manufacturing business. This will lead to a reduction in its intrinsic value
over time.
e.
The decision not to risk adjust means that the company will accept too many projects in the manufacturing
business and too few projects in the data processing business. This may affect the firm’s capital structure but
it will not affect its intrinsic value.
56.
Safeco Company and Risco Inc are identical in size and capital structure. However, the riskiness of their assets
and
cash flows are somewhat different, resulting in Safeco having a WACC of 10% and Risco a WACC of
12%.
Safeco is considering Project X, which has an IRR of 10.5% and is of the same risk as a typical Safeco
project.
Risco is considering Project Y, which has an IRR of 11.5% and is of the same risk as a typical Risco
project.
Now assume that the two companies merge and form a new company, Safeco/Risco Inc. Moreover, the new
company’s market risk is an average of the pre-merger companies’ market risks, and the merger has no impact
on
either the cash flows or the risks of Projects X and Y. Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a.
If the firm evaluates these projects and all other projects at the new overall corporate WACC, it will probably
become riskier over time.
b.
If evaluated using the correct post-merger WACC, Project X would have a negative NPV.
c.
After the merger, Safeco/Risco would have a corporate WACC of 11%. Therefore, it should reject Project X
but accept Project Y.
d.
Safeco/Risco’s WACC, as a result of the merger, would be 10%.
e.
After the merger, Safeco/Risco should select Project Y but reject Project X. If the firm does this, its
corporate WACC will fall to 10.5%.