8. Suppose the United States has a comparative advantage over Mexico in producing pork. The principle of comparative
advantage asserts that
the United States should produce more pork than what it requires and export some of it to Mexico.
the United States should produce a moderate quantity of pork and import the remainder of what it requires
from Mexico.
the United States should refrain altogether from producing pork and import all of what it requires from
Mexico.
Mexico has nothing to gain from importing United States pork.
9. Belarus has a comparative advantage in the production of linen, but Russia has an absolute advantage in the production
of linen. If these two countries decide to trade,
Belarus should export linen to Russia.
Russia should export linen to Belarus.
trading linen would provide no net advantage to either country.
Without additional information about opportunity costs, this question cannot be answered.
10. Suppose that a worker in Boatland can produce either 5 units of wheat or 25 units of fish per year, and a worker in
Farmland can produce either 25 units of wheat or 5 units of fish per year. There are 10 workers in each country. Political
pressure from the fish lobby in Farmland and from the wheat lobby in Boatland has prevented trade between the two
countries on the grounds that cheap imports would kill the fish industry in Farmland and the wheat industry in Boatland.
As a result, Boatland produces and consumes 25 units of wheat and 125 units of fish per year while Farmland produces
and consumes 125 units of wheat and 25 units of fish per year. If the political pressure were overcome and trade were to
occur, each country would completely specialize in the product in which it has a comparative advantage. If trade were to
occur, the combined output of the two countries would increase by
25 units of wheat and 25 units of fish.
50 units of wheat and 50 units of fish.
75 units of wheat and 75 units of fish.