Hotelling’s model has been used to describe differentiation in the political “market.”
Suppose that 100 voters are evenly distributed between the extreme left and the extreme
right on the political spectrum, and that all voters vote, and they always vote for the
candidate closest to them on this spectrum. The numbers on this spectrum represent the
number of voters lying to the left of the number. So, at the midpoint, fifty voters lie to
the left and fifty to the right. At the extreme right end, all 100 voters lie to the left.
To an economic naturalist, this model helps explain why political candidates:
A. take more extreme positions than are held by the general population.
B. move toward more centrist positions during campaign season.
C. work to bring federally funded projects to their home districts.
D. are loyal to their political parties.
Refer to the figure below.
When Row Resorts and Column Cruises both play their dominant strategy:
A. both firms do better than if they had both played their dominated strategy.
B. Row Resorts earns a higher profit than does Column Cruises.
C. both firms do worse than if they had both played their dominated strategy.
D. Column Cruises earns a higher profit than does Row Resorts.