charge $3 per gallon, and each earns a profit of $1,000. If Joe cuts his price to $2.90 and
Sam continues to charge $3, then Joe’s profit will be $1,350, and Sam’s profit will be
$500. Similarly, if Sam cuts his price to $2.90 and Joe continues to charge $3, then
Sam’s profit will be $1,350, and Joe’s profit will be $500. If Sam and Joe both cut their
price to $2.90, then they will each earn a profit of $900. You may find it easier to
answer the following questions if you fill in the payoff matrix below.
In this situation, the Nash equilibrium yields a:
A. lower payoff than each would receive if each played his dominant strategy.
B. higher payoff than each would receive if each played his dominant strategy.
C. lower payoff than each would receive if each played his dominated strategy.
D. the same payoff that each would receive if each played his dominated strategy.
Suppose Erie Textiles can dispose of its waste “for free” by dumping it into a nearby
river. While the firm benefits from dumping waste into the river, the waste reduces fish
and bird reproduction. This causes damage to local fishermen and bird watchers. At a
cost, Erie Textiles can filter out the toxins, in which case local fishermen and bird
watchers will not suffer any damage. The relevant gains and losses (in thousands of
dollars) for the three parties are listed below.
When Erie Textiles operates without a filter, the total gain (in thousands of dollars) to
all three parties is ______.
A. $985
B. $325