A local restaurant offers an “all you can eat” Sunday brunch for $12. Susan eats four
servings, but leaves half of a fifth helping uneaten. Why?
a. Her marginal value of a serving of brunch has fallen below $12.
b. Her marginal value of a serving has fallen below $2.36 ($12 divided by 5 servings).
c. Her marginal value of food has fallen to zero.
d. The total value she places on brunch today exactly equals $12.
Consider a consumer who spends all income on only two goods: bread and wine. An
extra loaf of bread would give the consumer 10 extra util, while an extra bottle of wine
would give the consumer 60 extra utils. Bread costs 50¢ per loaf, and wine costs $6
per bottle. In this situation, the consumer:
a. could increase utility by buying more bread and less wine.
b. could increase utility by purchasing more wine and less bread.
c. has maximized utility and attained consumer equilibrium.
d. is violating the law of diminishing marginal utility.
Suppose Gizmo Inc. is willing to sell one gizmo for $10, a second gizmo for $12, a
third for $14, and a fourth for $20, and the market price is $20. What is Gizmo Inc.’s
producer surplus?
a. $56 c. $20
b. $24 d. $10