A) Price will still serve as a rationing device causing quantity supplied to exceed 12
pizzas.
B) There is no need for price to serve as a rationing device in this case because the new
equilibrium quantity exceeds the original equilibrium quantity.
C) Price will still serve as a rationing device causing quantity demanded to fall from 12
to 10 pizzas.
D) The market cannot move to a new equilibrium until there is also a change in supply.
Investors put up $1,040,000 to construct a building and purchase all equipment for a
new restaurant. The investors expect to earn a minimum return of 10 per cent on their
investment. The restaurant is open 52 weeks per year and serves 900 meals per week.
The fixed costs are spread over the 52 weeks (i.e. prorated weekly). Included in the
fixed costs is the 10% return to the investors and $2,000 in other fixed costs. Variable
costs include $2,000 in weekly wages, and $600 per week in materials, electricity, etc.
The restaurant charges $8 on average per meal.
If the restaurant were to shut down, losses per week would be
A) $2,000.
B) $3,600.
C) $4,000.
D) $7,200.