Additional Application MAKING THE FEDERAL RESERVE MORE
TRANSPARENT What are the advantages and disadvantages of the Federal Reserve
becoming more transparent about its actions and decisions and disclosing more
information to the public? In recent years, the Fed has gradually become more open in
its deliberations. For many years, the Fed would not even say if it had changed interest
rates. These policies began to change slowly in the 1990s. Starting in 2000, after each
FOMC meeting the Fed announces its target for the federal funds rate and makes a brief
statement explaining its actions. But should the Fed go further in describing its intended
future policies? There was enough interest on this very topic for the FOMC to hold a
special meeting—the first since 1979—to discuss the issue. Some members of the
FOMC, including the current chairman Ben Bernanke, believed that the financial
markets needed more information so that they would have a clearer idea of what future
Fed policy—and short-term interest rates—were likely to be. Other members, including
William Poole, the president of the St. Louis Federal Reserve Bank, disagreed. Poole
felt that the financial markets understood the implicit rules that the Fed followed and
that issuing a more complex public statement would just confuse
matters. The special meeting did not lead to any dramatic change in the Fed’s
communication policies. But now the members of the FOMC participate in drafting
statements. The Fed clearly recognizes that its statements may be just as important as its
actions. According to the application, some members of the FOMC are against making
its intended policies more explicit because:
A) making a more complex public statement could cause a recession.
B) making a more complex public statement would confuse the financial market.
C) making a more complex public statement would allow the possibility for increased
bank profits.
D) making a more complex public statement would make the Fed useless.
At a price of $1000, Dell Computer Co. is willing to sell 20 laptops and Compaq is
willing to sell 40 laptops. IBM will only sell laptops if the price is $1300 or higher.
From the point of view of IBM, $1300 is the:
A) minimum supply price.
B) minimum cost.
C) the equilibrium price.