Pollutants
The following questions refer to the situation below. A chemical plant’s production adds
pollutants to a stream which irrigates a farm’s crops. The pollutants damage the farm’s
crops, increasing the firm’s costs by $800 per month. The crop damage may be
eliminated in two ways: the chemical plant can install a new filtering system costing
$300 per month, or the farm can install a new irrigation system costing $600 per month.
Suppose transactions costs are zero. Who should be made liable for the crop damage if
the goal is to achieve an efficient outcome?
a. The chemical plant should be made liable, because it is the source of the pollution.
b. The chemical plant should be made liable, because it possesses the least-cost method
of eliminating the externality.
c. The farm should be made liable, because it can receive a bribe from the chemical
plant.
d. An efficient outcome will be achieved no matter who is made liable for the crop
damage.
Suppose a new Dunkin’ Donuts shop has opened in town. Its main competitor,
Doughnut Delite, will likely
a. begin to produce more doughnuts.
b. experience higher marginal costs.
c. reduce its prices and production.