Recent studies about wealth inequality and income inequality indicate that the
American public’s estimates of the distribution of wealth and income are quite different
than actual data suggests. With respect to wealth, the top 20 percent of households hold
more than 84% and the bottom 40 percent hold less than 1%, yet the public’s estimates
were 59% and 9%, respectively. In terms of income inequality, the public estimated that
the CEO-to-worker pay-ratio was 30-to-1, whereas data suggests the actual ratio is
354-to-1, up from 20-to-1 in the 1960s.
President Obama has referred to economic inequality as “the defining challenge of our
time,” and although Americans seem to recognize that income and wealth gaps have
widened, only 5 percent indicate that this inequality is a problem that needs to be
addressed.
Source: Nicholas Fitz, “Economic Inequality: It’s Far Worse Than You Think,”
Scientific American, March 31, 2015.
Refer to the Article Summary above. The article discusses wealth inequality, and for
some people this means a more equitable distribution of wealth is needed in the
economy. Would an equitable distribution of wealth necessarily be the most efficient
distribution of wealth?
A) Yes, equitable and efficient are two different words which have the same definition.
B) Yes, in order for the distribution to be equitable, it must also be efficient.
C) No, it is impossible to have an economically efficient distribution which is also an
equitable distribution.
D) No, an economically efficient distribution of wealth would not necessarily be
equitable.
According to the law of one price
A) if transaction costs are zero, identical goods should sell for the same price
everywhere.
B) if transactions costs are zero, firms must sell a product at a price equal to its
marginal cost.