If the banking system has a required reserve ratio of 40 percent, then the money
multiplier is
A) 2.
B) 2.5.
C) 4.
D) 8.
Additional Application AN UNFORTUNATE GAMBLE What explained the
decision by the Japanese government to increase taxes in the 1990s when the economy
was still suffering from a recession? The Japanese government sharply increased taxes
on consumption in 1997—just as Japan was in the midst of its prolonged recession.
Why did the government do this? The reasons were clear. As the economy slumped,
fiscal deficits were increasing, as taxes fell and government spending rose. Policy
makers understood that their society was aging rapidly and that this would mean even
more demands on the public sector in the near future. They became convinced that the
current fiscal deficits plus the inevitable future demands on the government would lead
to long-run increases in government spending. To avoid crowding out of investment in
the future, they decided to tax consumption in order to reduce it. Their goal was to
match the increases in government spending with decreases in consumption spending
and therefore not experience crowding out of investment. Although policy makers were
right to consider the long-run consequences of increases in government spending, they
made the unfortunate gamble that the short-run effects of the tax increase would not
hinder the economy’s recovery. They were wrong, because the tax increase prolonged
the recession. Although it is important to consider the long-run consequences of policy,
it is important to understand the short-run consequences as well. According to the
application, what was the Japanese government’s gamble?
A) They imposed a tax on consumption, but hoped that it did not interfere with the
economy’s recovery.