Suppose that Paraguay and Guyana are both engaged in the production of soybeans and
grapefruit, and that Paraguay has an absolute advantage in the production of both
goods. If Guyana has a comparative advantage in the production of soybeans, then
Guyana
A) has a higher opportunity cost for soybeans, which means it should specialize in the
production of grapefruit and engage in trade.
B) has a lower opportunity cost for producing soybeans, but specialization is not
feasible because Paraguay has a lower monetary cost of soybean production.
C) has a lower opportunity cost for soybeans, which means that it should specialize in
production of soybeans and engage in trade.
D) should continue to produce soybeans, but only for domestic consumption, because
trade is not a viable option.
You value your economics textbook at $15. Someone else values it at $30, and that
person is willing to pay you $20 for your textbook. Would selling your textbook to this
person for $20 be Pareto efficient?
A) No, because you did not receive the maximum amount the other person would have
been willing to pay for the textbook.
B) No, the person paid you $20 for the book so his net benefit was $10, whereas your
net benefit was only $5. For this change to be Pareto efficient, each of you should have
the same net benefit.
C) Yes, because both of you are better off as a result of the trade.
D) Yes, because even though you gain from the trade and he loses, there is the potential
for you to compensate him for his loss.