A home-owner refuses to give consent for a search. In response, the officer states that
he will be back with a warrant to search within the hour, even though the officer has no
probable cause to have a warrant issued. After hearing the statement, the homeowner
allowed police to enter and search. The officers found evidence of crime. It is most
likely that the evidence:
a. will be judged inadmissible because the statement from the officer concerning the
warrant was not true at the time the statement was made.
b. will be judged inadmissible because the officer violated the rights of the resident just
by asking permission to search.
c. will be ruled admissible because the consent was not obtained through force or threat
of force.
d. will be ruled admissible because the officer had enough evidence establishing
reasonable suspicion to obtain a warrant.
The Katz v. United States (1967) case _____.
a. expanded Fourth Amendment protections
b. did away with the idea of “reasonable expectation of privacy”
c. broadened search to include interference with possessory interests
d. restricted the ability of defendants to argue privacy violations occurred