CASE 13.1
Throughout most of our nation’s history, the three broad constitutional provisions
dealing with trial by jury had little applicability in state courts. The U.S. Constitution
applied only to trials in federal courts. These practices changed dramatically, however,
when the Supreme Court decided Duncan v. Louisiana (1968), ruling that the jury
provisions of the Sixth Amendment were incorporated by the Due Process Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment to apply to state courts, as well. Subsequent decisions grappled
with the problem of defining the precise meaning of the right to trial by jury. The most
important issues concerned the scope of the right to a jury trial, the size of the jury, and
unanimous versus nonunanimous verdicts.
Calvin is arrested for breaking and entering and assault with a weapon. If convicted, he
faces a potential sentence total of five years in prison or 10 years on probation. His
attorney recommends he take a plea bargain offering him one year in prison. If he goes
to trial which of the following rights does he have?
a. jurors at his trial must reach a unanimous verdict
b. the jury at his trial must have at least 8 members
c. the media will not be allowed in the courtroom
d. the right to a jury trial
CASE 6.2
Ethical issues facing prosecutors are very different from those confronting defense
attorneys because prosecutors do not represent individual clients. Prosecutors often
define their jobs as representing victims of crime and the police, but these are not
typically considered to fit under the attorney”client relationship. Rather, the client of the
prosecutor is the government, and for this reason prosecutors are given special
responsibilities.
When prosecutors are not acting as the government’s advocate in some judicial phase of
the criminal justice process, what kind of immunity do they enjoy?
a. Absolute immunity.