Copyright Cengage Learning. Powered by Cognero.
11. An element that is not required for the crime of possession with intent to deliver is that the accused possessed:
a large amount of an illegal drug.
a counterfeit credit card.
Drug Laws in the United States
CRLA.GAAN.18.16.02 – 16.02 – Identify the elements of the crime of possession of an
illegal drug with intent to deliver
12. In Gonzales v. Raich, the court reasoned that the private use of marijuana might have:
an adverse impact on federal drug laws.
a positive impact on federal drug laws.
an adverse impact on state drug laws.
a positive impact on state drug laws.
Drug Laws in the United States
CRLA.GAAN.18.16.04 – 16.04 – Explain the rationale of the Supreme Court’s holding in
Gonzales v. Raich
13. In Gonzales v. Raich, the court reasoned Congress had the power under the Commerce Clause to regulate:
even purely intra-state use of marijuana.
only purely intra-state use of marijuana.
even purely inter-state use of marijuana.
only purely inter-state use of marijuana.
Drug Laws in the United States
CRLA.GAAN.18.16.04 – 16.04 – Explain the rationale of the Supreme Court’s holding in
Gonzales v. Raich
14. The crime of ______ is not covered under the Uniform Controlled Substances Act.
manufacture or delivery of an illegal drug
possession with intent to deliver an illegal drug
delivery or possession with intent to deliver a counterfeit substance
possession of alcohol by a minor
Drug Laws in the United States
CRLA.GAAN.18.16.01 – 16.01 – List the ways a person can violate the Uniform Controlled
Substances Act
15. Medical use of marijuana is permitted in some states. Although medical users can be prosecuted under federal laws in