the outcome would have been worse if counsel had not been ineffective
the outcome would have been better if counsel had not been ineffective
the outcome would have been the same if counsel had not been ineffective
CASE 7.3
Indigents are defendants who cannot afford to pay a lawyer and, therefore, are entitled to a
lawyer for free. Although the Supreme Court has essentially mandated the development of
indigent-defense systems, it has left the financing and type of delivery system up to states and
counties, which have considerable discretion in adopting programs (Worden and Worden 1989).
How best to provide legal representation for the poor has been a long-standing issue for the
courts and the legal profession. In the United States, the three primary methods are assigned
counsel, contract systems, and public defender.
43. The assigned counsel method is
attorneys appointed by the judge on a case-by-case basis.
attorneys hired to provide services for a specified dollar amount.
a salaried public official representing all indigent defendants.
None of these answers is correct.
44. The contract systems method is
attorneys appointed by the judge on a case-by-case basis.
attorneys hired to provide services for a specified dollar amount.
a salaried public official representing all indigent defendants.
None of these answers is correct.
45. The public defender method is
attorneys appointed by the judge on a case-by-case basis.
attorneys hired to provide services for a specified dollar amount.
a salaried public official representing all indigent defendants.
None of these answers is correct.
TRUE/FALSE
1. As written by the framers of the U.S. Constitution more than 200 years ago, the right to
counsel meant only that a judge could not prevent a defendant from bringing a lawyer to
court. Thus, it affected only those who could afford to hire their own lawyers.